State of Conservation
25
Reports
15
Properties concerned
24
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
1993close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
| States Parties: |
 Albania Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Belgium Bulgaria Switzerland Czechia Germany Spain France Croatia Italy North Macedonia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovakia Ukraine
|
| Year: | 2013 |
| Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| States Parties: |
Italy
|
| Year: | 2021 |
| Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| Other Threats: | New buffer zone necessary |
| States Parties: |
Italy
|
| Year: | 2019 |
| Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| States Parties: |
Italy
|
| Year: | 2017 |
| Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| Other Threats: | Series of structural collapses at the property |
| States Parties: |
Italy
|
| Year: | 2015 |
| Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| Other Threats: | Series of structural collapses at the property |
| States Parties: |
Italy
|
| Year: | 2013 |
| Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| Other Threats: | Series of structural collapses at the property |
| States Parties: |
 Greece
|
| Year: | 1993 |
| Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| Other Threats: | Need to strengthen the protection of the site |
| States Parties: |
 Belarus
|
| Year: | 2011 |
| Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| States Parties: |
Belarus Poland
|
| Year: | 2024 |
| Document Source: | WHC/24/46.COM/7B.Add.3 |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| Other Threats: | Alterations of the hydrological regime; Border fence impeding mammal movements |
| States Parties: |
Belarus Poland
|
| Year: |
2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
|
| Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add.2 |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| Other Threats: | Alterations of the hydrological regime; Border fence impeding mammal movements |
| States Parties: |
Belarus Poland
|
| Year: |
2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
|
| Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| Other Threats: | Alterations of the hydrological regime; Border fence impeding mammal movements |
| States Parties: |
Belarus Poland
|
| Year: | 2019 |
| Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| Other Threats: | Alterations of the hydrological regime; Border fence impeding mammal movements |
| States Parties: |
Belarus Poland
|
| Year: | 2017 |
| Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| Other Threats: | Alterations of the hydrological regime; Border fence impeding mammal movements |
| States Parties: |
Belarus Poland
|
| Year: | 2016 |
| Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| States Parties: |
Greece
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/10 |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| States Parties: |
Germany
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2 |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| States Parties: |
 Canada
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| Other Threats: | Risk of fire |
| States Parties: |
 Russian Federation
|
| Year: |
2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
|
| Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| States Parties: |
Russian Federation
|
| Year: | 2021 |
| Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| States Parties: |
 Malta
|
| Year: | 1995 |
| Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
| Threats*: | Human resources |
| Other Threats: | Worrying state of conservation of some temples; Fragility of the structures (cracks, etc.); Partial collapse of a temple |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
