State of Conservation
18
Reports
18
Properties concerned
12
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
1993close
Date end:1993close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
archaeological site of delphiArchaeological Site of Delphi | greece Greece | 1993 | Human resources,
Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation,
Localised utilities,
Other Threats: Need to strengthen the protection of the site |
No |
auschwitz birkenau german nazi concentration and extermination camp (1940-1945)Auschwitz Birkenau German Nazi Concentration and Extermination Camp (1940-1945) |
poland Poland | 1993 | Commercial development,
Other Threats: Threat to the integrity of the property (not specified - supermarket project?) |
No |
burgos cathedralBurgos Cathedral | spain Spain | 1993 | Governance,
Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Need for restoration works |
No |
frontiers of the roman empireFrontiers of the Roman Empire | germany,united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland Germany United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
1993 | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Mining, | No |
hanseatic city of lubeckHanseatic City of Lübeck | germany Germany | 1993 | Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Discovery of mural paintings - need for restoration |
No |
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul | turkiye Türkiye | 1993 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Need to monitor movements which could affect the structure of the building |
No |
historic centre of florenceHistoric Centre of Florence | italy Italy | 1993 | Terrorism, | No |
historic centre of rome, the properties of the holy see in that city enjoying extraterritorial rights and san paolo fuori le muraHistoric Centre of Rome, the Properties of the Holy See in that City Enjoying Extraterritorial Rights and San Paolo Fuori le Mura | holy see,italy Italy Holy See |
1993 | Air pollution, Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Terrorism, | No |
historic centre of saint petersburg and related groups of monumentsHistoric Centre of Saint Petersburg and Related Groups of Monuments | russian federation Russian Federation | 1993 | Changes in traditional ways of life and knowledge system,
Financial resources,
Housing,
Legal framework,
Management activities,
Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Steady deterioration of the city's pysical environment; Large-scale rehabilitation project for the Hermitage |
No |
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation Russian Federation | 1993 | Financial resources,
Governance,
Legal framework,
Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
No |
la fortaleza and san juan national historic site in puerto ricoLa Fortaleza and San Juan National Historic Site in Puerto Rico | united states of america United States of America | 1993 |
Other Threats: No specific threat identified |
No |
old city of dubrovnikOld City of Dubrovnik | croatia Croatia | 1993 | Legal framework, Management systems/ management plan, War, | Yes |
old raumaOld Rauma | finland Finland | 1993 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
old town of ávila with its extra-muros churchesOld Town of Ávila with its Extra-Muros Churches | spain Spain | 1993 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
palaces and parks of potsdam and berlinPalaces and Parks of Potsdam and Berlin | germany Germany | 1993 | No | |
pythagoreion and heraion of samosPythagoreion and Heraion of Samos | greece Greece | 1993 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
santiago de compostela (old town)Santiago de Compostela (Old Town) | spain Spain | 1993 | Housing, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, | No |
taos puebloTaos Pueblo | united states of america United States of America | 1993 | Air transport infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.