State of Conservation
17
Reports
8
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2017close
Region:
Africaclose
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Structural instability of Stele 3 |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Structural instability of Stele 3 |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Structural instability of Stele 3 |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Lack of documentation and equipment |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Lesotho South Africa |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Lesotho South Africa |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Need for further research and documentation to establish an inventory of rock art in Sehlabathebe National Park; Need for study of the potential cultural contribution of other landscape elements to the cultural values of Sehlabathebe National Park |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Challenging situation of community livelihoods; Condition and conservation of the Laetoli hominid footprints |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | South Africa |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | a) Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities; b) Fire |
States Parties: | South Africa |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities |
States Parties: | Benin |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Fire at the site |
States Parties: | Benin |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Fire; Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components |
States Parties: | Benin |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Fire; Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components |
States Parties: | Benin |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components |
States Parties: | Benin |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components; |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Lack of capacities in conservation techniques |
Danger List: | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.