Royal Palaces of Abomey
Factors affecting the property in 2017*
- Governance
- Interpretative and visitation facilities
- Management systems/ management plan
- Other Threats:
Fire at the site
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
- Absence of a national legislative mechanism for the protection of cultural heritage (issue resolved)
- Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components (issue resolved)
- Lack and loss of documentation on the site (issue resolved)
- Lack of presentation and interpretation at the site
- Lack of sharing of knowledge between site managers and among authorities
- Need to distinguish between the site museum and the World Heritage site
- Lack of effective firefighting measures
- Need to improve the governance, organization and implementation of mechanisms for monitoring, coordination and involvement of the different parties concerned
- Need to revise the risk management plan as well as the plan for the management, conservation and enhancement of the property
- Need to take priority measures for the prevention of fire risks
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2017
Total amount granted: USD 450,000 from the Government of Japan and from the Riksantikvaren (Norwegian Cultural Heritage Directorate)
International Assistance: requests for the property until 2017
Total amount approved : 118,000 USD
2014 | EVALUATION DU PLAN DE CONSERVATION, DE GESTION. MISE EN ... (Approved) | 5,000 USD |
1997 | Royal Palaces of Abomey (Approved) | 20,000 USD |
1995 | ICCROM/Abomey Palace: analysis of architectural ... (Approved) | 20,000 USD |
1994 | ICCROM/CRATerre: Training for a professional team and a ... (Approved) | 33,000 USD |
1989 | Financial contribution to the restoration works on the ... (Approved) | 20,000 USD |
1985 | Financial contribution to restoration works concerning ... (Approved) | 20,000 USD |
Missions to the property until 2017**
May/June 2004: Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission; February 2006: Joint World Heritage Centre/CRAterre-ENSAG/Getty Conservation Institute mission; February 2007: Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS mission; December 2012: Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission; April 2016: Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2017
A joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission visited the property in April 2016. Subsequently, the State Party submitted a report on the state of conservation of the property on 8 December 2016 and updated information on 2 March 2017. A summary of this report and the mission report are available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/323/documents. The State Party provides the following information:
- Following the fire of 14 January 2015, the ministry responsible for Culture implemented a programme of work to restore the eight huts of the Houégbadja Palace and rehabilitate the damaged parts of the Gbéhanzin Palace;
- The Ministry of Tourism and Culture has appointed an official responsible for the management of the collections and administration of the Historical Museum of Abomey and plans to appoint a person responsible for the collections and buildings;
- Non-compliant construction of private residences of the royal families took place on the property and in the buffer zone;
- The district of Dosseme is no longer occupied by the Dadassi;
- The entire property is in a state of advanced degradation due to various factors, including vandalism, fires, inclement weather, insecurity and insalubrity (termites, tall grass).
The following actions are planned for 2017:
- Additional staff for the property;
- Restoration of the roof of the Tomb of the 41 Wives of King Glèlè;
- Evaluation of the 2007-2011 Management Plan, and drafting of the new Management Plan for the property (implementation 2018);
- Improvement of the museum's facilities and collections, and the opening of an "archaeological" space and the installation of new permanent exhibitions on the property.
The Reactive Monitoring mission made it possible to collect the following additional information:
- Fire hydrant installed by the Albi project is not operational due to lack of connection to the water supply network;
- Rehabilitation of certain components of the property that does not comply with the rules and principles of heritage protection;
- Dysfunction of the bodies responsible for management;
- Existence of various cultural projects proposed by national and foreign partners.
As part of the national strategy to make Abomey one of the main tourism hubs by enhancing the heritage, the State Party informed the Centre that feasibility studies are underway for restoration works and museum projects in Abomey (Estimated cost: 123 billion CFA francs – approx. USD 204 million).
Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2017
The information provided in the State Party's report reflects its efforts to address the main concerns expressed in recent Committee decisions. It is encouraging to note that the State Party has foreseen funding for the evaluation of the 2007-2011 lapsed management plan and for the development of a new management plan for the property. The completion of the management plan remains the highest priority. It is recommended that the Committee take note of the State Party's intention to revise the management plan and urges it to finalize the plan as soon as possible.
Restoration works on the parts of the property damaged by the January and December 2015 fires have been completed. However, it is regrettable that the report does not provide sufficient information on the December fire. It is also recommended that the Committee take note that the State Party has carried out the restoration work on the parts of the property damaged by the fires.
While acknowledging the progress made, the overall state of conservation of the property remains a concern. It is imperative that measures be taken to prevent degradation related to vandalism, fire, insecurity, insalubrity, and termite attacks. It is regrettable that the State Party does not provide information on the development of the risk management plan and on fire prevention measures. It is also a matter of concern that some of the rehabilitation work on the components of the property, including the construction of private residences of the royal families on the property and in the buffer zone, are not in conformity with the rules and principles of heritage conservation, safeguarding and protection.
The State Party’s decision to appoint an official with special responsibility for the management of the collections and administration of the Historical Museum of Abomey, together with a building overseer, is commendable, but the recruitment has still not been carried out.
Various tourism and cultural projects proposed by the State Party, national and foreign partners, and in particular activities undertaken in the framework of cooperation with the city of Albi, should be continued. The results of ongoing feasibility studies for the upgrading of Abomey as a tourism hub will be submitted to the Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies.
It is recommended that the Committee encourage the State Party to develop a holistic tourism management strategy as part of the management plan.
Insofar as the various dysfunctions noted continue to be a serious threat to the property, it is recommended that the Committee acknowledge the actions carried out but that it express its concern about the general state of conservation of the property and the inadequacy of progress since the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger in 2007, and that it encourages the State Party to implement, as soon as possible and in close collaboration with the various stakeholders, all the recommendations of the mission reports of 2012 and 2016.
Summary of the interventions
Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2017
41 COM 7B.66
Royal Palaces of Abomey (Benin) (C 323bis)
The World Heritage Committee,
- Having examined Document WHC/17/41.COM/7B,
- Recalling Decision 39 COM 7B.37, adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 39th session (Bonn, 2015),
- Noting that the State Party has made available funds for the evaluation and revision of the management plan, urges the State Party to act as soon as possible to start this process and to transmit these documents to the World Heritage Centre for examination by the Advisory Bodies;
- Takes note that the State Party has carried out renovation work on the eight huts of the Houégbadja Palace and parts of the Gbéhanzin Palace, which had been damaged by fires in 2015;
- Reiterates its request to the State Party to ensure that intrusive or non-conforming construction work on the property is prevented, and that priority is given to finalizing the plan for the management of risks, disasters and other hazards to the property, including fires, and to transmit it to the World Heritage Centre, and recalls the obligation to inform the World Heritage Centre, in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines, of any significant project or restoration that could modify the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, or of any incident;
- Also takes note of the feasibility studies for projects aiming to enhance Abomey as a tourism hub launched by the State Party and encourages it to develop a holistic tourism strategy in the framework of the management plan;
- Recognizes the actions taken since the State Party's last report in 2015 but expresses its concern about the general state of conservation of the property and the insufficient progress since the property was removed from the List of World Heritage in Danger In 2007, and requests the State Party to implement as soon as possible all the recommendations of the 2012 and 2016 Reactive Monitoring missions;
- Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2018, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 43rd session in 2019.
Draft Decision: 41 COM 7B.66
The World Heritage Committee,
- Having examined Document WHC/17/41.COM/7B,
- Recalling Decision 39 COM 7B.37, adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 39th session (Bonn, 2015),
- Noting that the State Party has made available funds for the evaluation and revision of the management plan, urges the State Party to act as soon as possible to start this process and to transmit these documents to the World Heritage Centre for examination by the Advisory Bodies;
- Takes note that the State Party has carried out renovation work on the eight huts of the Houégbadja Palace and parts of the Gbéhanzin Palace, which had been damaged by fires in 2015;
- Reiterates its request to the State Party to ensure that intrusive or non-conforming construction work on the property is prevented, and that priority is given to finalizing the plan for the management of risks, disasters and other hazards to the property, including fires, and to transmit it to the World Heritage Centre, and recalls the obligation to inform the World Heritage Centre, in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines, of any significant project or restoration that could modify the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, or of any incident;
- Also takes note of the feasibility studies for projects aiming to enhance Abomey as a tourism hub launched by the State Party and encourages it to develop a holistic tourism strategy in the framework of the management plan;
- Recognizes the actions taken since the State Party's last report in 2015 but expresses its concern about the general state of conservation of the property and the insufficient progress since the property was removed from the List of World Heritage in Danger In 2007, and requests the State Party to implement as soon as possible all the recommendations of the 2012 and 2016 Reactive Monitoring missions;
- Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2018, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 43rd session in 2019.
Exports
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.