State of Conservation
74
Reports
29
Properties concerned
22
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2005close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | State of dilapidation of the Puerta Elvira area |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Greece |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Need to strengthen the protection of the site |
States Parties: | Greece |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/2,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Need to strengthen the protection of the site |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.6,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Belarus Poland |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Fencing along the international border |
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | a) Lack of adequate protection and conservation of the site; b) Poor state of conservation of the property ; c) Insufficient implementation of the recommendations of the joint missions |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Portugal |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Portugal |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Deteriorating state of conservation |
States Parties: | Lithuania Russian Federation |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Earthen containment structures |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Earthen containment structures |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Fire |
States Parties: | Germany United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Germany United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.