Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

30
Reports
10
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2014close
Threats* : Input of excess energyclose
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
Other Threats: Deliberate neglect of historic properties
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Input of excess energy
Other Threats: Need for an inventory of the park's natural and cultural resources
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4
Threats*: Input of excess energy
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9
Threats*: Input of excess energy
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/5
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 1992
Document Source: WHC-92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/15
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: Argentina
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.001/3
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: Argentina
Year: 1992
Document Source: WHC-92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: Argentina
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/15
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: Morocco
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
Other Threats: The general state of conservation of the property is a cause for concern
States Parties: Malta
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: Zambia Zimbabwe
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: Zambia Zimbabwe
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: Zambia Zimbabwe
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: Lao People's Democratic Republic
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Input of excess energy
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B.Add
Threats*: Input of excess energy
Other Threats: Brucella infection threat to bison population

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top