State of Conservation
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.204/INF.9,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.201/INF.13,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC.94/CONF.003/07Rev |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/13 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | rural poverty |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Rapid economic development |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Rapid economic development |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Rapid economic development |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Risks linked to addressing environmental impacts of individual projects to the neglect of monitoring cumulative impacts of the overall development of Ha Long City and other areas surrounding the World Heritage area |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Brazil Bulgaria Cambodia China Croatia Cuba Czechia Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Estonia France Germany Greece Guatemala Honduras India Indonesia Italy Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Lithuania Mauritania Montenegro Morocco Nepal Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Republic of Korea Romania Russian Federation South Africa Spain Türkiye Uganda United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uzbekistan Viet Nam
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.