Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Historic Centre of Vienna

Austria
Factors affecting the property in 2024*
  • Housing
  • Legal framework
  • Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
  • Other Threats:

    Desirability of conservation of historic roof constructions within the property

Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Housing: High-rise construction projects in Central Vienna (proposed Vienna Ice-Skating Club – Intercontinental Hotel – Vienna Konzerthaus ‘Heumarkt Neu’ project)
  • Proposed new developments, including the Wien Museum and the Winterthur Building
  • Legal framework: Lack of effectiveness of the overall protection and governance of the property (issue partially resolved)
  • Legal framework: Lack of appropriateness of planning controls in the ‘High-Rise Concept 2014’ and the ‘Glacis Master Plan’ (issue partially resolved)
  • Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
  • Desirability of conservation of historic roof constructions within the property (issue partially resolved)
Threats for which the property was inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger

The current planning controls: adopted developments and lack of adequate planning rules

Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger

Proposed and adopted by the World Heritage Committee in its Decision 44 COM7A.32

Corrective Measures for the property

Proposed and adopted by the World Heritage Committee in its Decision 44 COM7A.32

Timeframe for the implementation of the corrective measures
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2024

N/A

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2024
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Missions to the property until 2024**

March 2002: ICOMOS Expert Mission to the ‘Historic Centre of Vienna’; May 2002: World Heritage Centre Mission to the ‘Historic Centre of Vienna’; September 2012: Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission to the ‘Palace and Gardens of Schönbrunn’ and the ‘Historic Centre of Vienna’; November 2015: ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission to the ‘Historic Centre of Vienna’; November 2018: joint high-level World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Advisory mission to the Historic Centre of Vienna; March 2024: Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Advisory mission to the ‘Historic Centre of Vienna’

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2024

On 30 January 2024, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1033/documents, providing information on measures implemented in response to Decision 45 COM 7A.55. Subsequently, a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Advisory mission visited the property in March 2024 (mission report will be available at the above-mentioned link). The State Party reports on the progress of the implementation of the adopted corrective measures as follows:

  • Significant progress has been made in implementing corrective measures for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger;
  • In September 2023, the Vienna City Council adopted a legally binding annex to the Viennese Building Code, committing to safeguard the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, thereby anchoring the new Management Plan in the legal system of the City;
  • In November 2023, the Provincial Parliament of Vienna adopted the new Viennese Building Code, which includes provisions to strengthen the protection of World Heritage properties;
  • A revised proposal for the Heumarkt Neu project (submitted to the World Heritage Centre in August 2023) reduced the height of the residential slab (from 56.5m to 49.9m), reduced the built volume by 20% and eliminated two storeys. A new Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) acknowledges the improvement with respect to OUV, but proposes further modifications to achieve the required outcome that does not increase the negative impact of the existing Hotel Intercontinental and supports the OUV of the property;
  • An HIA assessed the building activities in the Schwarzenberg Garden and concluded that the impact on the OUV of the property would not be significant, but proposed mitigation measures to minimise or eliminate the impact. The HIA also included a comprehensive survey of the conservation of the historic gardens within the property and a series of recommendations;
  • The City of Vienna completed the renovation of the Wien Museum in 2023;
  • The extension of the roof cadastre to include historic metal structures is progressing;
  • The amendment of the Federal Monuments Protection Act by the National Assembly of Austria is expected in 2024;
  • Most of the corrective measures to achieve the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR) adopted by the Committee have been completed;
  • A joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Advisory mission was invited to the property in March 2024 to advise on the degree of implementation of the corrective measures.

In relation to the August 2023 design version of the Heumarkt Neu project, an ICOMOS Technical Review of the submitted design documentation and associated HIA was transmitted to the State Party on 20 February 2024. Following the Advisory mission, the World Heritage Centre received a further design revision of the Heumarkt Neu project from the State Party on 22 April 2024, proposing a further reduction of the planned residential building by two floors compared to the August 2023 design version, and a modification of the façade design of the proposed hotel component.

The HIA for the Schwarzenberg Garden has been subject to a Technical Review by ICOMOS, the results of which were transmitted to the State Party on 25 June 2024.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2024

The State Party, the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies have continued to exchange views on the corrective measures to achieve the adopted DSOCR.

The adopted amendment to the Viennese Building Code is welcome, as is the continued extension of the roof cadastre to include historic metal structures. The forthcoming amendment of the Federal Monuments Protection Act by the National Assembly and a new Urban Development Strategy for Vienna, known as STEP 2035 (to replace ‘STEP 2025’), are reported to include provisions for the protection of World Heritage properties. The revised and updated Management Plan for the property, which was accepted by the Committee in Decision 45 COM 7A.55, is being implemented and the corrective measures require that the efficacy of the Management Plan be proven in practice through monitoring and evaluation over a period of five years. The Committee may wish to reiterate that revisions to the Management Plan should address issues raised in the 2022 ICOMOS Technical Review, that the role of the site manager needs to be strengthened, and that a monitoring and evaluation programme should be established and reported on. Improving the definition of the attributes that convey the OUV of the property would provide a baseline for this process. Other remaining planning challenges include the lack of a requirement to carry out systematic impact assessments for projects that may adversely affect OUV, the need to establish a systematic process for determining projects that require notification to the World Heritage Centre, and provisions for the legal protection of historic gardens in private ownership.

The ICOMOS Technical Review of the HIA for projects in the Schwarzenberg Garden, including an underground parking garage, the creation of a new restaurant building and beer garden, and the proposed construction of a new hotel wing associated with the reuse of the Schwarzenberg Palace, concluded that as the Schwarzenberg Palace and Garden are an important attribute of the property’s OUV, the proposed hotel wing should not proceed as it would have a negative impact on both the Belvedere and Schwarzenberg complexes and would prevent the State Party from achieving the associated element of the DSOCR. The Technical Review makes further recommendations and suggests that the State Party should submit further details of the design of the Schwarzenberg Garden and documentation of the Schwarzenberg Palace renovation project to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies and implement the mitigation measures included in the HIA.

The Wien Museum project was completed in 2023, and although it was not modified in accordance with the recommendations of the 2018 high-level World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Advisory mission, and the full design plans previously requested by the Committee were only provided with the State Party’s 2024 state of conservation report, making the corrective measure related to the Wien Museum technically non-compliant, the renovated museum does not have a fundamentally negative impact on the OUV of the property.

With regard to the August 2023 design version of the Heumarkt Neu project, the corresponding HIA concluded that the structural and functional impacts were ‘major positive’ and ‘irrelevant’, while the visual impacts of the proposed design remained ‘large negative’ to the integrity of the property. The ICOMOS Technical Review of February 2024 concurred with the conclusions of the HIA and, while acknowledging that the further reduction in design was a positive step forward, considered that it did not result in a project variant that would enable the State Party to achieve the DSOCR (method of verification for Corrective Measure 5 under ‘Protection and Management’), as it still adversely impacts on the OUV of the property and therefore proposed that there should be further design revisions.

The 2024 Advisory mission acknowledged several positive elements of the Heumarkt Neu project for the local community of the City of Vienna but advised that the benefits of the project could and should be realised without eroding the OUV of the property and emphasised that the high-rise elements remained problematic. The mission presented four design options for these latter two elements and noted that the chosen design should be developed through an iterative impact assessment process (following the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context) and should respect the authenticity and integrity of the property as a whole and not threaten its OUV. Within the four options proposed by the mission, the maximum recommended height of the future hotel building would be the same as that of the existing building and the height of the residential building is recommended to be visibly lower than that of the existing hotel. The further revised design version of April 2024 (which is the fourth design revision since 2018) proposes to reduce the height of the residential building by a further two storeys (bringing the total height down from 49.9m to 44m, whereas the original design was proposed as a 69.5m high tower). This further revised design version, although considered as a significant effort, does not propose to reduce the height of the planned new hotel slab, which remains higher than the existing building (48m compared to 38m) and its horizontal dimension is also greater than the current structure, although a slightly modified façade design is proposed. As a result, the latest proposal still fails to meet the requirements of the DSCOR.

The 2024 Advisory mission was made aware of several planned projects in and around the property, including the construction of an underground visitor centre directly in front of the Upper Belvedere Palace. An architectural competition resulted in the selection of a project in June 2024. The Advisory mission recommended that the State Party submit documentation, including an HIA, for the proposed visitor centre to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies as a matter of urgency and before any irreversible decisions are taken. The mission was also informed that an extension of the underground metro system, including new stations, which is nearing completion, has also not yet been notified to the World Heritage Centre. These projects, proposed for highly sensitive locations within the property, which have not been notified to the World Heritage Centre in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines, nor have they been subject to an HIA in accordance with paragraphs 110 and 118bis of the Operational Guidelines, illustrate that the management system is not yet functioning in a manner that guarantees the safeguarding of the OUV of the property.

The 2024 Advisory mission acknowledged that the State Party had developed a management system that, once fully implemented, should maintain the OUV of the property. It noted that, while significant progress had been made in the implementation of corrective measures, several critical measures remain to be fully implemented (including the development of a final acceptable design for the Heumarkt Neu project and the revision of the design of the proposed new hotel wing in the Schwarzenberg Garden). The property should therefore remain on the List of World Heritage in Danger. The Committee may therefore wish to commend the State Party for its efforts to work towards achieving the adopted DSOCR and encourage it to continue the full implementation of the corrective measures, including the monitoring of the adequacy of the management system to protect the OUV of the property, and the processes for assessing impacts on heritage and determining projects that require notification to the World Heritage Centre.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2024
46 COM 7A.1
Historic Centre of Vienna (Austria) (C 1033)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/24/46.COM/7A.Add.3,
  2. Recalling Decisions 37 COM 7B.71, 39 COM 7B.94, 40 COM 7B.49, 41 COM 7B.42, 42 COM 7A.5, 43 COM 7A.45, 44 COM 7A.32 and 45 COM 7A.55 adopted at its 37th (Phnom Penh, 2013), 39th (Bonn, 2015), 40th (Istanbul/UNESCO, 2016), 41st (Krakow, 2017), 42nd (Manama, 2018), 43rd (Baku, 2019), extended 44th (Fuzhou/online, 2021) and extended 45th (Riyadh, 2023) sessions respectively,
  3. Commends the State Party on the progress made in implementing the adopted corrective measures required to achieve the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR) and previous decisions of the Committee, including the amendment of the Viennese Building Code, the extension of the roof cadastre to include historic metal structures, and the forthcoming amendment of the Federal Monuments Protection Act;
  4. Notes the findings and recommendations of the 2024 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Advisory mission and requests the State Party to consider the recommendations as an essential working tool to ensure further improvement of the new management system and to guide the future revision of the management plan accepted by the World Heritage Committee at its extended 45th session (Riyadh, 2023);
  5. Also notes that the efficacy of the Management Plan has to be demonstrated in practice through regular monitoring, reiterates its previous advice that the revisions to the Management Plan should address issues raised in the 2022 ICOMOS Technical Review, and further notes that other management issues that remain to be addressed include strengthening the role of the site managers, establishing and reporting on a monitoring and evaluation programme, and improving the definition of the attributes that convey the OUV of the property;
  6. Acknowledges the submission of the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for projects in the Schwarzenberg Garden and also encourages the State Party to implement both the mitigation measures contained in the HIA and the recommendations of the relevant ICOMOS Technical Review, including not proceeding with the current design for the construction of a new hotel wing associated with the reuse of the Schwarzenberg Palace, but to further develop alternatives and to submit further details of the design for this project and for the rehabilitation of the Schwarzenberg Garden, as well as documentation on the Schwarzenberg Palace renovation project, to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  7. Appreciates the continued efforts of the State Party and other actors to further revise the design plans for the Heumarkt Neu project, including the submission of a fourth revision of the original design by further reducing the negative impacts of the proposal on the OUV of the property and the attributes that convey it;
  8. Considers the further revised design proposal for refinement of the Heumarkt Neu development should be informed by the four options proposed by the 2024 Advisory mission, in order to achieve the relevant DSOCR element, and urges the State Party to submit detailed plans and designs on the basis of HIA to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  9. Regrets that at an architectural competition for a new underground visitors centre for the Upper Belvedere Palace was awarded without the project being notified to the World Heritage Centre in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines or an impact assessment being undertaken in accordance with paragraphs 110 and 118bis, and requests the State Party to submit documentation on this project, including an HIA following the methodology of the 2022 Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context, to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies before any decisions are taken on its implementation that may be difficult to reverse;
  10. Also regrets that the project for the extension of the metro system with new stations in the property was not communicated to the World Heritage Centre in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines, and further requests the State Party to provide the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies with details of the project, its current status and any impact assessments on the OUV of the property, in accordance with paragraphs 110 and 118bis of the Operational Guidelines;
  11. Notes furthermore that a number of the adopted corrective measures remain to be implemented and therefore encourages furthermore the State Party to continue their implementation in consultation with the World Heritage Centre and Advisory Bodies, with a view to achieving the DSOCR;
  12. Requests that a Reactive Monitoring mission takes place soon after the submission of the detailed plans and designs of the Heumarkt Neu project in its version of April 2024;
  13. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2025, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and on the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session;
  14. Decides to retain the Historic Centre of Vienna (Austria) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
46 COM 8C.2
Update of the List of World Heritage in Danger (Retained Properties)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined the state of conservation reports of properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger (WHC/24/46.COM/7A, WHC/24/46.COM/7A.Add, WHC/24/46.COM/7A.Add.2, WHC/24/46.COM/7A.Add.3 and WHC/24/46.COM/7A.Add.4),
  2. Decides to retain the following 55 properties on the List of World Heritage in Danger:
  • Afghanistan, Cultural Landscape and Archaeological Remains of the Bamiyan Valley
  • Afghanistan, Minaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam
  • Austria, Historic Centre of Vienna
  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of), City of Potosí
  • Central African Republic, Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park
  • Côte d'Ivoire / Guinea, Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Garamba National Park
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kahuzi-Biega National Park
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Okapi Wildlife Reserve
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Virunga National Park
  • Egypt, Abu Mena
  • Honduras, Río Plátano Biosphere Reserve
  • Indonesia, Tropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra
  • Iraq, Ashur (Qal'at Sherqat)
  • Iraq, Hatra
  • Iraq, Samarra Archaeological City
  • Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls (site proposed by Jordan)
  • Kenya, Lake Turkana National Parks
  • Lebanon, Rachid Karami International Fair-Tripoli
  • Libya, Archaeological Site of Cyrene
  • Libya, Archaeological Site of Leptis Magna
  • Libya, Archaeological Site of Sabratha
  • Libya, Old Town of Ghadamès
  • Libya, Rock-Art Sites of Tadrart Acacus
  • Madagascar, Rainforests of the Atsinanana
  • Mali, Old Towns of Djenné
  • Mali, Timbuktu
  • Mali, Tomb of Askia
  • Mexico, Islands and Protected Areas of the Gulf of California
  • Micronesia (Federated States of), Nan Madol: Ceremonial Centre of Eastern Micronesia
  • Niger, Aïr and Ténéré Natural Reserves
  • Panama, Fortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo
  • Peru, Chan Chan Archaelogical Zone
  • Romania, Roșia Montană Mining Landscape
  • Serbia, Medieval Monuments in Kosovo
  • Solomon Islands, East Rennell
  • State of Palestine, Hebron/Al-Khalil Old Town
  • State of Palestine, Palestine: Land of Olives and Vines – Cultural Landscape of Southern Jerusalem, Battir
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Aleppo
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Bosra
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Damascus
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient Villages of Northern Syria
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Crac des Chevaliers and Qal’at Salah El-Din
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Site of Palmyra
  • Ukraine, Kyiv: Saint-Sophia Cathedral and Related Monastic Buildings, Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra
  • Ukraine, L’viv – the Ensemble of the Historic Centre
  • Ukraine, The Historic Centre of Odesa
  • United Republic of Tanzania, Selous Game Reserve
  • United States of America, Everglades National Park
  • Uzbekistan, Historic Centre of Shakhrisyabz
  • Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Coro and its Port
  • Yemen, Historic Town of Zabid
  • Yemen, Landmarks of the Ancient Kingdom of Saba, Marib
  • Yemen, Old City of Sana’a
  • Yemen, Old Walled City of Shibam.
46 COM 8D
Clarifications of property boundaries and areas by States Parties

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Documents WHC/24/46.COM/8D and WHC/24/46.COM/8D.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 45 COM 8D adopted at its extended 45th session (Riyadh, 2023),
  3. Also recalling that out of the 557 World Heritage properties subject to clarification, 36% are still to be submitted by the concerned States Parties;
  4. Acknowledges the excellent work accomplished by States Parties in the clarification of the boundaries of their World Heritage properties and commends them for their efforts to improve the credibility of the World Heritage List;
  5. Recalls that the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies are not able to examine proposals for minor or significant modifications to boundaries of World Heritage properties whenever the delimitations of such properties as inscribed remain unclear;
  6. Takes note of the clarifications of boundaries and areas provided by States Parties for the following properties, as presented in the Annex of Document WHC/24/46.COM/8D and Document WHC/24/46.COM/8D.Add:

    ARAB STATES

    • Mauritania, Banc d'Arguin National Park

    EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA

    • Austria, Historic Centre of Vienna
    • Austria, Semmering Railway
    • Bulgaria, Boyana Church
    • Bulgaria, Madara Rider
    • Bulgaria, Rila Monastery
    • Bulgaria, Rock-Hewn Churches of Ivanovo
    • Bulgaria, Thracian Tomb of Kazanlak
    • Czechia, Holy Trinity Column in Olomouc
    • Czechia, Jewish Quarter and St Procopius' Basilica in Třebíč
    • Germany, Abbey and Altenmünster of Lorsch
    • Germany, Castles of Augustusburg and Falkenlust at Brühl
    • Germany, Margravial Opera House Bayreuth
    • Germany, Pilgrimage Church of Wies
    • Germany, Wartburg Castle
    • Greece, Archaeological Site of Olympia
    • Greece, Delos
    • Italy, Historic Centre of the City of Pienza
    • Latvia, Historic Centre of Riga
    • Russian Federation, Kizhi Pogost
    • Spain, Doñana National Park
    • Spain, Tower of Hercules
    • Sweden, Agricultural Landscape of Southern Öland
    • Switzerland, Old City of Berne
    • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, City of Bath
    • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Maritime Greenwich
    • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Old and New Towns of Edinburgh
    • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Tower of London;
  7. Requests the UNESCO World Heritage Centre to continue the identification and collection of geographic and cartographic information of World Heritage properties in nominations where the required information is not available or not adequate;
  8. Also requests the States Parties which have not yet answered the questions raised in the framework of the Retrospective Inventory, to provide all clarifications and documentation as soon as possible, and by 1 December 2024, for their subsequent examination, if the technical requirements are met, at its 47th session;
  9. Noting that the budget allocated to this activity may not be sufficient to cover the costs foreseen for the current biennium, invites States Parties to contribute financially to this end.
Draft Decision: 46 COM 7A.1

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/24/46.COM/7A.Add.3,
  2. Recalling Decisions 37 COM 7B.71, 39 COM 7B.94, 40 COM 7B.49, 41 COM 7B.42, 42 COM 7A.5, 43 COM 7A.45, 44 COM 7A.32, and 45 COM 7A.55 adopted at its 37th (Phnom Penh, 2013), 39th (Bonn, 2015), 40th (Istanbul/UNESCO, 2016), 41st (Krakow, 2017), 42nd (Manama, 2018), 43rd (Baku, 2019), extended 44th (Fuzhou/online, 2021) and extended 45th (Riyadh, 2023) sessions respectively,
  3. Commends the State Party on the progress made in implementing the adopted corrective measures required to achieve the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR) and previous decisions of the Committee, including the amendment of the Viennese Building Code, the extension of the roof cadastre to include historic metal structures, and the forthcoming amendment of the Federal Monuments Protection Act;
  4. Notes the findings and recommendations of the 2024 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Advisory mission and encourages the State Party to fully implement them with a view to completing the corrective measures and achieving the DSOCR;
  5. Also notes that the corrective measures require that the efficacy of the Management Plan be demonstrated in practice through monitoring and evaluation over a period of five years, reiterates its previous advice that the revisions to the Management Plan should address issues raised in the 2022 ICOMOS Technical Review, and further notes that other management issues that remain to be addressed include strengthening the role of the site managers, establishing and reporting on a monitoring and evaluation programme, and improving the definition of the attributes that convey the OUV of the property;
  6. Acknowledges the submission of the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for projects in the Schwarzenberg Garden and also encourages the State Party to implement both the mitigation measures contained in the HIA and the recommendations of the relevant ICOMOS Technical Review, including not proceeding with the current design for the construction of a new hotel wing associated with the reuse of the Schwarzenberg Palace, but to further develop alternatives and to submit further details of the design for this project and for the rehabilitation of the Schwarzenberg Garden, as well as documentation on the Schwarzenberg Palace renovation project, to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  7. Appreciates the continued efforts of the State Party and other actors to further revise the design plans for the Heumarkt Neu project, including the submission of a fourth revision of the original design, with a view to reducing the negative impacts of the proposal on the OUV of the property and the attributes that convey it;
  8. Further encourages the State Party to follow up on the findings and recommendations of the 2024 Advisory mission for the Heumarkt Neu development, to consider the four design options proposed by the mission, to develop the final project design through an iterative impact assessment process in accordance with the 2022 Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context, in order to achieve the relevant DSOCR element, and to submit the resulting revised design and HIA to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  9. Regrets that at an architectural competition for a new underground visitors centre for the Upper Belvedere Palace was awarded without the project being notified to the World Heritage Centre in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines or an impact assessment being undertaken in accordance with paragraphs 110 and 118bis, and requests the State Party to submit documentation on this project, including an HIA following the methodology of the 2022 Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context, to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies before any decisions are taken on its implementation that may be difficult to reverse;
  10. Also regrets that the project for the extension of the metro system with new stations in the property was not communicated to the World Heritage Centre in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines, and further requests the State Party to provide the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies with details of the project, its current status and any impact assessments on the OUV of the property, in accordance with paragraphs 110 and 118bis of the Operational Guidelines;
  11. Notes furthermore that a number of the adopted corrective measures remain to be implemented and therefore encourages furthermore the State Party to continue their implementation in consultation with the World Heritage Centre and Advisory Bodies, with a view to achieving the DSOCR;
  12. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2025, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and on the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session;
  13. Decides to retain Historic Centre of Vienna (Austria) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Report year: 2024
Austria
Date of Inscription: 2001
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (ii)(iv)(vi)
Danger List (dates): 2017-present
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2024) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 46COM (2024)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top