Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Archaeological Site of Leptis Magna

Libya
Factors affecting the property in 2021*
  • Desertification
  • Illegal activities
  • War
  • Other Threats:

    Deterioration of the stone masonry; Sand covering certain areas of the property; Graffiti and fires

Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Illegal Activities
  • Desertification
  • Flooding (issue resolved)
  • Conflict situation
  • Deterioration of the stone masonry
  • Sand covering certain areas of the property
  • Graffiti and fires
  • Discharge of domestic wastewater at the west of the property (issue resolved)
Threats for which the property was inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger
Conflict situation prevailing in the country
Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger

Not yet drafted

Corrective Measures for the property

Not yet identified

Timeframe for the implementation of the corrective measures

Not yet identified

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2021

Total amount granted: USD 24,543 for the European Project “Protecting Cultural Heritage and Diversity in Complex Emergencies for Stability and Peace”.
June 2020: Netherlands Funds in Trust: USD 49,620 for Strengthening national capacities for the elaboration of corrective measures for Libyan World Heritage properties. 

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2021
Requests approved: 3 (from 1988-1990)
Total amount approved : 45,500 USD
Missions to the property until 2021**

1988: UNESCO mission; March 2003: World Heritage Centre mission; May 2006: World Heritage Centre mission; January 2007: Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2021

On 6 February 2020, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report and an updated version on 11 February 2021. The executive summaries of both reports are available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/183/documents/. Progress in a number of conservation issues addressed by the Committee at its previous sessions is presented, as follows:

  • Despite the difficulties faced since 2011, the Department of Antiquities (DoA) continues to undertake conservation measures in collaboration with the local community and the Tourism Police, in addition to awareness raising in coordination with municipal authorities. No cases of damage or serious violations have been reported;
  • In 2019, a committee was established, as per Government Decision 155/2019, for the Management and Implementation of the Strategy for Preservation and Conservation of World Heritage properties in Libya;
  • The DoA has carried out regular monitoring visits to evaluate the property’s state of conservation and considers that the situation has improved in the last three years. Funding is still a main constraint, preventing the property’s regular maintenance. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the site and its museum have been closed since March 2020, operating with a reduced number of staff;
  • Vandalism and animal grazing have been reduced. The unauthorized discharge of domestic wastewater was addressed through coordinated work with the local authority by clearing the path for discharge away from the property, managing to prevent any possible flooding in the future. Regular cleaning of vegetation has taken place, and a study on damage caused by vegetation and other threats has helped to establish control mechanisms that started to be implemented in 2020. A fire erupted in August 2020 due to dry vegetation, but was successfully controlled;
  • The DoA is considering building sand barriers to protect the property from sand encroachment, especially the most vulnerable buildings. Discussions on the use of nanotechnology as a possibility to reduce the effects of weathering and sand drift are being considered;
  • Periodic cleaning of the Wadi Lebda path was conducted to avoid flooding. Restoration and cleaning works were undertaken at the Punic Market, the Severan Basilica, the Barko cemetery and the colonnaded street. The project for the installation of a security fence, including the rehabilitation of the entrance of the site is in the contracting phase. Other protective measures such as a tree barrier and earthen embankments also being used;
  • Efforts have been sought to establish laboratory facilities and to undertake conservation training, resulting in an improved state of conservation of the property in the past three years. The process for the definition of a buffer zone for the property has continued and a minor boundary modification proposal has been submitted, while the preparation of a management plan has been initiated;
  • Several partnerships have contributed to technical and financial support for undertaking the above-mentioned activities, such as the Training in Action programme and the Libyan Cultural Heritage Management Project (MaliCH) aiming at building capacities and supporting the conservation of the property. The State Party intends to call on the international community to provide more financial and technical support, and considers the March 2020 technical meeting with ICOMOS and the World Heritage Centre as successful in initiating direct discussion and consultation.

The State Party reiterates that the property is not facing any specific ascertained danger and requests its removal from the List of World Heritage in Danger. To this end, it has formally invited a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission to assess the state of conservation of the property.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2021

The efforts undertaken by the State Party demonstrate its commitment to the conservation of the property, despite the prevailing situation. The constraints caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the lack of funding do not allow for major conservation works. It is recommended that the Committee call upon the international community to support the State Party in its conservation efforts.

No information was provided concerning the deterioration of stone masonry, as mentioned in previous reports. The initiation of the process to draft a Management Plan and the measures undertaken regarding sand control, flood and fire prevention, and resolving the issue of domestic wastewater discharge are welcome.

Several projects have been implemented at the property, including cleaning and condition assessment in the framework of the Training in Action project, as well as works undertaken at the Punic Market, the Severan Basilica, Barko cemetery and the colonnaded street. It is recommended that the World Heritage Committee request that technical specifications and materials for conservation/restoration works are discussed with ICOMOS before implementation. The initiation of the procedure for the installation of a fence and the ongoing discussions regarding other protection measures are welcome. All of these initiatives are important; however, they are not enough to guarantee the appropriate state of conservation of the property.

The World Heritage Centre organized a meeting in Paris in March 2020 to address the elaboration of a proposed Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR) and related corrective measures, boundary modifications and Tentative Lists. Participants comprised the State Party, ICOMOS, the UNESCO Rabat Office, and the World Heritage Centre. Discussions and technical recommendations focused on the minor boundary modification proposal submitted by the State Party and planned projects. The boundary modification submitted with the State Party report is currently under review. 

The first meeting for the elaboration of the DSOCR for the property took place on 1 April 2021.This process is being elaborated through the support of the World Heritage Fund and the Netherlands Funds in Trust project “Strengthening national capacities for the elaboration of corrective measures for Libyan World Heritage properties”. It is recommended that the State Party continues this dialogue with the World Heritage Centre and ICOMOS on the elaboration of the Retrospective Statement of Outstanding Universal Value and the DSOCR, to be submitted in line with Paragraph 164 and 183 of the Operational Guidelines.

Important efforts have been made to secure new projects, such as the MaliCH project funded by the International alliance for the protection of heritage in conflict areas (ALIPH). It is recommended that the Committee welcome these efforts and requests the State Party to keep the Committee informed on progress of their implementation.

It is recommended that the State Party’s important efforts to conserve the property are oriented in line with the action plan that was developed during the International Expert Meeting on the Safeguard of Libyan Cultural Heritage, held in Tunis in May 2016 (report available at http://whc.unesco.org/en/news/1496), building on the short-, medium- and long-term measures identified during that meeting. It is therefore recommended that the Committee request the State Party to provide information on progress made in the implementation of this Action Plan.

The effects of the conflict situation in the country raise much concern about the sustainability of efforts made, as the prevailing constraints prevent the undertaking of essential actions to protect and conserve the property. Nevertheless, the recent improvement in the situation may have a positive impact on the conservation of the property. It remains crucial that the joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission takes place as soon as the security conditions permit. In the meantime, it is important that the State Party continues to keep the Committee, through the World Heritage Centre, updated on the situation on the ground and the implementation of intervention measures,

It is therefore recommended that the Committee retain the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2021
44 COM 7A.12
Archaeological Site of Leptis Magna (Libya) (C 183)
Decision: 44 COM 7A.12

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/21/44.COM/7A,
  2. Recalling Decision 43 COM 7A.24, adopted at its 43rd session (Baku, 2019),
  3. Commends the important efforts made by the State Party to raise funds and undertake activities for the conservation of the property and its Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), despite the difficult situation and working conditions on the ground, due to the effects of the conflict and the COVID-19 pandemic, and urges it to continue its efforts in this regard to the extent possible;
  4. Requests the State Party to keep the World Heritage Centre informed about the evolution of the situation at the property and of any new measures undertaken to ensure its protection and conservation, as well as any future plans for major restoration or new construction projects that may affect the OUV of the property, in conformity with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines, and also requests that technical specifications and materials to be used in conservation interventions are discussed with ICOMOS before they are applied;
  5. Further requests the State Party to report on any progress achieved in the implementation of the Action Plan developed during the International Expert Meeting on the Safeguard of Libyan Cultural Heritage (Tunis, May 2016);
  6. Welcomes the progress made in the finalization of the Minor Boundary Modification proposal and requests furthermore the State Party to continue the process in close consultation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies, and to submit it in line with Paragraph 164 of the Operational Guidelines;
  7. Encourages the State Party to pursue the development of a Management Plan for the property, and invites it to seek for the necessary technical and financial support and to allocate the necessary resources for its implementation;
  8. Acknowledges the invitation by the State Party for a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission to the property, to take place as soon as the security conditions permit;
  9. Also Welcomes the initiation of the process to develop a set of corrective measures and a timeframe for their implementation, as well as the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR), in collaboration with the World Heritage Centre and Advisory Bodies;
  10. Reiterates its call for an increased mobilization of the international community to provide financial and technical support to the State Party, including through the UNESCO Heritage Emergency Fund, to implement the short-, medium- and long-term measures identified during the 2016 Tunis Meeting;
  11. Expresses its appreciation to the Netherlands Funds in Trust and other donors and institutions, for the support provided to the State Party towards the conservation and management of the property;
  12. Requests moreover the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2022, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 45th session;
  13. Decides to retain the Archaeological Site of Leptis Magna (Libya) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
44 COM 8C.2
Update of the List of World Heritage in Danger (Retained Properties)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined the state of conservation reports of properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger (WHC/21/44.COM/7A, WHC/21/44.COM/7A.Add, WHC/21/44.COM/7A.Add.2, WHC/21/44.COM/7A.Add.2.Add),
  2. Decides to retain the following properties on the List of World Heritage in Danger:
  • Afghanistan, Cultural Landscape and Archaeological Remains of the Bamiyan Valley (Decision 44 COM 7A.28)
  • Afghanistan, Minaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam (Decision 44 COM 7A.29)
  • Austria, Historic Centre of Vienna (Decision 44 COM 7A.32)
  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of), City of Potosí (Decision 44 COM 7A.35)
  • Central African Republic, Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park (Decision 44 COM 7A.39)
  • Côte d'Ivoire / Guinea, Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (Decision 44 COM 7A.40)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Garamba National Park (Decision 44 COM 7A.41)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kahuzi-Biega National Park (Decision 44 COM 7A.42)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Okapi Wildlife Reserve (Decision 44 COM 7A.43)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Virunga National Park (Decision 44 COM 7A.45)
  • Egypt, Abu Mena (Decision 44 COM 7A.5)
  • Honduras, Río Plátano Biosphere Reserve (Decision 44 COM 7A.55)
  • Indonesia, Tropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra (Decision 44 COM 7A.52)
  • Iraq, Ashur (Qal'at Sherqat) (Decision 44 COM 7A.6)
  • Iraq, Hatra (Decision 44 COM 7A.7)
  • Iraq, Samarra Archaeological City (Decision 44 COM 7A.8)
  • Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls (site proposed by Jordan) (Decision 44 COM 7A.10)
  • Kenya, Lake Turkana National Parks (Decision 44 COM 7A.47)
  • Libya, Archaeological Site of Cyrene (Decision 44 COM 7A.11)
  • Libya, Archaeological Site of Leptis Magna (Decision 44 COM 7A.12)
  • Libya, Archaeological Site of Sabratha (Decision 44 COM 7A.13)
  • Libya, Old Town of Ghadamès (Decision 44 COM 7A.14)
  • Libya, Rock-Art Sites of Tadrart Acacus (Decision 44 COM 7A.15)
  • Madagascar, Rainforests of the Atsinanana (Decision 44 COM 7A.48)
  • Mali, Old Towns of Djenné (Decision 44 COM 7A.1)
  • Mali, Timbuktu (Decision 44 COM 7A.2)
  • Mali, Tomb of Askia (Decision 44 COM 7A.3)
  • Mexico, Islands and Protected Areas of the Gulf of California (Decision 44 COM 7B.56)
  • Micronesia (Federated States of), Nan Madol: Ceremonial Centre of Eastern Micronesia (Decision 44 COM 7A.30)
  • Niger, Aïr and Ténéré Natural Reserves (Decision 44 COM 7A.49)
  • Palestine, Palestine: Land of Olives and Vines – Cultural Landscape of Southern Jerusalem, Battir (Decision 44 COM 7A.17)
  • Palestine, Hebron/Al-Khalil Old Town (Decision 44 COM 7A.16)
  • Panama, Fortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo (Decision 44 COM 7A.36)
  • Peru, Chan Chan Archaelogical Zone (Decision 44 COM 7A.37)
  • Senegal, Niokolo-Koba National Park (Decision 44 COM 7A.50)
  • Serbia, Medieval Monuments in Kosovo (Decision 44 COM 7A.33)
  • Solomon Islands, East Rennell (Decision 44 COM 7A.53)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Aleppo (Decision 44 COM 7A.18)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Bosra (Decision 44 COM 7A.19)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Damascus (Decision 44 COM 7A.20)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient Villages of Northern Syria (Decision 44 COM 7A.21)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Crac des Chevaliers and Qal’at Salah El-Din (Decision 44 COM 7A.22)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Site of Palmyra (Decision 44 COM 7A.23)
  • Uganda, Tombs of Buganda Kings at Kasubi (Decision 44 COM 7A.4)
  • United Republic of Tanzania, Selous Game Reserve (Decision 44 COM 7A.51)
  • United States of America, Everglades National Park (Decision 44 COM 7A.54)
  • Uzbekistan, Historic Centre of Shakhrisyabz (Decision 44 COM 7A.31)
  • Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Coro and its Port (Decision 44 COM 7A.38)
  • Yemen, Historic Town of Zabid (Decision 44 COM 7A.25)
  • Yemen, Old City of Sana’a (Decision 44 COM 7A.26)
  • Yemen, Old Walled City of Shibam (Decision 44 COM 7A.27).
Draft Decision: 44 COM 7A.12

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/21/44.COM/7A,
  2. Recalling Decision 43 COM 7A.24, adopted at its 43rd session (Baku, 2019),
  3. Commends the important efforts made by the State Party to raise funds and undertake activities for the conservation of the property and its Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), despite the difficult situation and working conditions on the ground, due to the effects of the conflict and the COVID-19 pandemic, and urges it to continue its efforts in this regard to the extent possible;
  4. Requests the State Party to keep the World Heritage Centre informed about the evolution of the situation at the property and of any new measures undertaken to ensure its protection and conservation, as well as any future plans for major restoration or new construction projects that may affect the OUV of the property, in conformity with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines, and also requests that technical specifications and materials to be used in conservation interventions are discussed with ICOMOS before they are applied;
  5. Further requests the State Party to report on any progress achieved in the implementation of the Action Plan developed during the International Expert Meeting on the Safeguard of Libyan Cultural Heritage (Tunis, May 2016);
  6. Welcomes the progress made in the finalization of the Minor Boundary Modification proposal and requests furthermore the State Party to continue the process in close consultation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies, and to submit it in line with Paragraph 164 of the Operational Guidelines;
  7. Encourages the State Party to pursue the development of a Management Plan for the property, and invites it to seek for the necessary technical and financial support and to allocate the necessary resources for its implementation;
  8. Acknowledges the invitation by the State Party for a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission to the property, to take place as soon as the security conditions permit;
  9. Also Welcomes the initiation of the process to develop a set of corrective measures and a timeframe for their implementation, as well as the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR), in collaboration with the World Heritage Centre and Advisory Bodies;
  10. Reiterates its call for an increased mobilization of the international community to provide financial and technical support to the State Party, including through the UNESCO Heritage Emergency Fund, to implement the short-, medium- and long-term measures identified during the 2016 Tunis Meeting;
  11. Expresses its appreciation to the Netherlands Funds in Trust and other donors and institutions, for the support provided to the State Party towards the conservation and management of the property;
  12. Requests moreover the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2022, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 45th session in 2022;
  13. Decides to retain the Archaeological Site of Leptis Magna (Libya) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Report year: 2021
Libya
Date of Inscription: 1982
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (i)(ii)(iii)
Danger List (dates): 2016-present
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2020) .pdf
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
arrow_circle_right 44COM (2021)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top