State of Conservation
States Parties: | Benin |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Grave degradation of nearly two thirds of the mud brick buildings |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Benin |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Serious degradation of nearly 2/3 of the mud-brick constructions |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Collapsing monumentsNo participation of community |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Collapsing monumentsb) No participation of communit |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | - Collapsing monuments- No participation of communit |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Collapsing monuments due to lack of maintenance |
States Parties: | Sri Lanka |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Sri Lanka |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Sri Lanka |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Threats to wildlife migration and populations |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Slovenia |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Slovenia |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Turkmenistan |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Turkmenistan |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Environmental pressures |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Environmental pressure |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/8A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Vulnerability of the mosques |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Australia Belize Benin Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Cambodia Central African Republic China Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Dominican Republic Ecuador Ethiopia Germany Greece Guatemala Guinea Haiti Honduras India Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Mali Malta Mexico Morocco Nepal Niger North Macedonia Oman Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Romania Russian Federation Senegal Serbia Slovenia Solomon Islands Spain Sri Lanka Türkiye Turkmenistan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania Uzbekistan Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)Threats
Legal framework 194
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.