Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

25
Reports
25
Properties concerned
19
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start: 2006close
Date end:2006close
Threats* : Illegal activitiesclose
Air and Ténéré Natural Reserves (2006)
States Parties: Niger
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: Poverty
Danger List:  Yes
Arabian Oryx Sanctuary (2006)
States Parties: Oman
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Banc d'Arguin National Park (2006)
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Białowieża Forest (2006)
States Parties: Belarus Poland
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movement
Comoé National Park (2006)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Illegal activities
Danger List:  Yes
Durmitor National Park (2006)
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Galápagos Islands (2006)
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Garamba National Park (2006)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Illegal activities
Danger List:  Yes
Iguaçu National Park (2006)
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Kahuzi-Biega National Park (2006)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Illegal activities
Danger List:  Yes
Lake Baikal (2006)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Illegal activities
Manas Wildlife Sanctuary (2006)
States Parties: India
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: a) Forced evacuation of Park staffb) Destruction of Park infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park (2006)
States Parties: Central African Republic
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: Transhumance
Danger List:  Yes
Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (2006)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Illegal activities
Danger List:  Yes
Okapi Wildlife Reserve (2006)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Illegal activities
Danger List:  Yes
Río Plátano Biosphere Reserve (2006)
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Illegal activities
Danger List:  Yes
Rwenzori Mountains National Park (2006)
States Parties: Uganda
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: Degradation of buffer zone
Salonga National Park (2006)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Illegal activities
Danger List:  Yes
Sangay National Park (2006)
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Selous Game Reserve (2006)
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Belarus Brazil Central African Republic Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Ecuador Guinea Honduras India Indonesia Mauritania Montenegro Niger Oman Philippines Poland Russian Federation Uganda United Republic of Tanzania
Threats
Illegal activities 25

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top