Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

43
Reports
15
Properties concerned
13
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2006close
Threats* : Crop productionclose
Ancient Thebes with its Necropolis (2006)
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add,WHC-06/30.COM/7B.ADD2
Threats*: Crop production
Chan Chan Archaeological Zone (2004)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Crop production
Other Threats: Increase in salt contamination of the mud-brick
Danger List:  Yes
Comoé National Park (2006)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Comoé National Park (2005)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Crop production
Other Threats: diminishing protection
Danger List:  Yes
Dja Faunal Reserve (2006)
States Parties: Cameroon
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Crop production
Doñana National Park (2005)
States Parties: Spain
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Crop production
Everglades National Park (2003)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (2002)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/18
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (2001)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (2000)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1999)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.209/13
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1998)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/7
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1997)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/8A
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1996)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7A,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1995)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1994)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1993)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Crop production
Everglades National Park (1992)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1992
Document Source: WHC-92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Crop production
Everglades National Park (1989)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1989
Document Source: SC-89/CONF.004/5
Threats*: Crop production
Lines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa (2006)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Crop production
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Cameroon Côte d'Ivoire Egypt Ethiopia Guinea Honduras India Indonesia Peru Spain Sri Lanka United Republic of Tanzania United States of America
Threats
Crop production 43

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top