State of Conservation
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3A,WHC-98/CONF.203/7 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2A,WHC-97/CONF.208/8A |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
States Parties: | Syrian Arab Republic |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
States Parties: | Syrian Arab Republic |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
States Parties: | Syrian Arab Republic |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
States Parties: | Syrian Arab Republic |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Costa Rica Panama |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Costa Rica Panama |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties
Australia Brazil Cameroon China Colombia Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Dominica Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia Germany Greece Guinea Honduras India Iran (Islamic Republic of) Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Morocco Pakistan Panama Peru Russian Federation Senegal Spain Sweden Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Viet Nam Yemen
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.