State of Conservation
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Continued degradation of the civil architecture |
States Parties: | Mexico |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Urban decay of the Historic Centreb) Water and environmental pollutionc) Lack of monitoring systems |
States Parties: | Latvia |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Steady deterioration of the city's pysical environment; Large-scale rehabilitation project for the Hermitage |
States Parties: | Uzbekistan |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Uzbekistan |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Extensive cracks and leaning walls |
States Parties: | Uzbekistan |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Extensive cracks and leaning walls |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 1987 |
Document Source: | SC-87/CONF.005/INF.1 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Fires |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Hazardous condition of the buildingsb) Integrity of the propert |
States Parties: | Bolivia (Plurinational State of) |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Risk to humans posed by the dingo population |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Natural erosion, b) Dilapidation, c) Lack of maintenance |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Australia Benin Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Cambodia Central African Republic China Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Dominican Republic Ecuador Ethiopia Germany Greece Guatemala Guinea Haiti Honduras India Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Mali Malta Mexico Morocco Nepal Niger North Macedonia Oman Pakistan Peru Philippines Romania Russian Federation Senegal Slovenia Solomon Islands Spain Sri Lanka Türkiye Turkmenistan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania Uzbekistan Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)Threats
Legal framework 167
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.