State of Conservation
States Parties: | Croatia |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Lack of maintenance; b) Natural factors |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 1982 |
Document Source: | CLT-82/CONF.014/3,CLT-82/CONF.014/6 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Loss of historical authenticity |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Sri Lanka |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Lebanon |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.202/INF.7,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.204/INF.8,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B,WHC-97/CONF.208/INF.11 ,WHC.97/CONF.204/INF.08 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.202/5 Add.,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Mexico |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Sri Lanka |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Philippines |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A.Add.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Philippines |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Honduras |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Lack of infrastructure and services for small producers and potential tourism initiatives hinder sustainable economic development and are underlying causes for poverty, leading to over-exploitation of natural resources |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Benin |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Grave degradation of nearly two thirds of the mud brick buildings |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Benin |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Serious degradation of nearly 2/3 of the mud-brick constructions |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Collapsing monumentsb) No participation of communit |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Australia Benin Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Cambodia Central African Republic China Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Dominican Republic Ecuador Ethiopia Germany Greece Guatemala Guinea Haiti Honduras India Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Mali Malta Mexico Morocco Nepal Niger North Macedonia Oman Pakistan Peru Philippines Romania Russian Federation Senegal Slovenia Solomon Islands Spain Sri Lanka Türkiye Turkmenistan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania Uzbekistan Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)Threats
Legal framework 167
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.