Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

23
Reports
4
Properties concerned
4
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2002close
Threats* : Crop productionclose
Everglades National Park (2002)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/18
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (2001)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (2000)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1999)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.209/13
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1998)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/7
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1997)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/8A
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1996)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7A,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1995)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1994)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1993)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Crop production
Everglades National Park (1992)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1992
Document Source: WHC-92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Crop production
Everglades National Park (1989)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1989
Document Source: SC-89/CONF.004/5
Threats*: Crop production
Ngorongoro Conservation Area (2001)
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Crop production
Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1994)
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B,WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.1
Threats*: Crop production
Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1993)
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Crop production
Sinharaja Forest Reserve (2001)
States Parties: Sri Lanka
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Crop production
Sinharaja Forest Reserve (2000)
States Parties: Sri Lanka
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Crop production
Taï National Park (1990)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.003/3
Threats*: Crop production
Taï National Park (1989)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire
Year: 1989
Document Source: SC-89/CONF.003/12,SC-89/CONF.003/2,SC-89/CONF.004/12,SC-89/CONF.004/5
Threats*: Crop production
Taï National Park (1988)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire
Year: 1988
Document Source: SC-88/CONF.001/4A
Threats*: Crop production
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Côte d'Ivoire Sri Lanka United Republic of Tanzania United States of America
Threats
Crop production 23

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top