Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

102
Reports
29
Properties concerned
22
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2018close
Threats* : Management activitiesclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Gelati Monastery (2017)
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7A,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments
Danger List:  Yes
Gelati Monastery (2014)
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7A
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments
Danger List:  Yes
Gelati Monastery (2013)
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7A
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments
Danger List:  Yes
Gelati Monastery (2012)
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments
Danger List:  Yes
Gelati Monastery (2011)
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments
Danger List:  Yes
Gelati Monastery (2010)
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments
Gelati Monastery (2009)
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments
Gelati Monastery (2008)
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments
Gelati Monastery (2007)
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments
Gelati Monastery (2005)
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work of the monuments
Gelati Monastery (2004)
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Management activities
Historic Areas of Istanbul (2018)
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: decay and loss of Ottoman/vernacular architecture
Historic Areas of Istanbul (2017)
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas); Land Reclamation project
Historic Areas of Istanbul (2015)
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2015
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas); Land Reclamation project
Historic Areas of Istanbul (2013)
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas); Land Reclamation project
Historic Areas of Istanbul (2012)
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas)
Historic Areas of Istanbul (2011)
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: a) Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas);
Historic Areas of Istanbul (2010)
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: a) Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas);
Historic Areas of Istanbul (2009)
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areaslack of impact studies before large-scale developments are implemented
Historic Areas of Istanbul (2008)
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add2
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas);
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Albania Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Georgia Germany Ireland Italy Lithuania Malta Montenegro Poland Portugal Romania Russian Federation Serbia Spain Türkiye Ukraine United States of America
Threats
Management activities 102

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top