Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

13
Reports
7
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2008close
Threats* : Financial resourcesclose
Region: Arab Statesclose
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Financial resources
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Financial resources
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Financial resources
States Parties: Syrian Arab Republic
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.204/2B
Threats*: Financial resources
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Uncontrolled growth of plants and trees
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Financial resources
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Financial resources
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Financial resources
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.003/3
Threats*: Financial resources
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance; b) Natural factors
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Algeria
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: State of conservation of mosaics and other exposed structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Algeria
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Algeria
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top