Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

27
Reports
10
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2015close
Threats* : Ground water pollutionclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
chitwan national parkChitwan National Park nepal Nepal 1998 Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Increase in the natural rate of mortality of the rhinoceros
No
danube deltaDanube Delta romania Romania 2000 Ground water pollution, No
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2015 Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2014 Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2013 Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2012 Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2011 Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2010 Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
No
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2008 Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
No
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2007 Ground water pollution, Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2006 Ground water pollution, Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2005 Ground water pollution, Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2004 Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Concerns about numbers of boaters in Florida Bay and their impacts on bottomland wilderness, including especially propeller scars from boat groundings.
Yes
fossil hominid sites of south africaFossil Hominid Sites of South Africa south africa South Africa 2015 Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Acid mine drainage
No
fossil hominid sites of south africaFossil Hominid Sites of South Africa south africa South Africa 2013 Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Acid mine drainage
No
great barrier reefGreat Barrier Reef australia Australia 2015 Ground water pollution, No
great barrier reefGreat Barrier Reef australia Australia 2014 Ground water pollution, No
great barrier reefGreat Barrier Reef australia Australia 2013 Ground water pollution, No
great barrier reefGreat Barrier Reef australia Australia 2012 Ground water pollution, No
great barrier reefGreat Barrier Reef australia Australia 2011 Ground water pollution, No
kakadu national parkKakadu National Park australia Australia 2005 Ground water pollution, No
kakadu national parkKakadu National Park australia Australia 2004 Ground water pollution, No
lake baikalLake Baikal russian federation Russian Federation 2009 Ground water pollution, No
los katios national parkLos Katíos National Park colombia Colombia 2009 Ground water pollution, No
m'zab valleyM'Zab Valley algeria Algeria 2008 Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Degradation of the environment
No
m'zab valleyM'Zab Valley algeria Algeria 2006 Ground water pollution,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the environment
No
tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness australia Australia 1999 Ground water pollution, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top