State of Conservation
19
Reports
19
Properties concerned
18
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2001close
Date end:2001close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
ancient ksour of ouadane, chinguetti, tichitt and oualataAncient Ksour of Ouadane, Chinguetti, Tichitt and Oualata | mauritania Mauritania | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
ancient thebes with its necropolisAncient Thebes with its Necropolis | egypt Egypt | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
brasiliaBrasilia | brazil Brazil | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone | peru Peru | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures |
Yes |
fortifications on the caribbean side of panama: portobelo-san lorenzoFortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo | panama Panama | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
gunung mulu national parkGunung Mulu National Park | malaysia Malaysia | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Lack of inclusion of indigenous peoples and their claims in the decision to extend the Park |
No |
historic town of zabidHistoric Town of Zabid | yemen Yemen | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Lack of conservation measures |
Yes |
kahuzi-biega national parkKahuzi-Biega National Park | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | Yes |
ksar of ait-ben-haddouKsar of Ait-Ben-Haddou | morocco Morocco | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: This site has progressively become degraded |
No |
m'zab valleyM'Zab Valley | algeria Algeria | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Degradation of the overall natural environment |
No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india India | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures |
Yes |
manovo-gounda st floris national parkManovo-Gounda St Floris National Park | central african republic Central African Republic | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | Yes |
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve | cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | Yes |
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area | united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras Honduras | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | Yes |
sangay national parkSangay National Park | ecuador Ecuador | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | Yes |
serengeti national parkSerengeti National Park | united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Threats to wildlife migration and populations |
No |
simien national parkSimien National Park | ethiopia Ethiopia | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity |
Yes |
virunga national parkVirunga National Park | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.