Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Mixedclose
Date Start: 1994close
Date end:1994close
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
goreme national park and the rock sites of cappadociaGöreme National Park and the Rock Sites of Cappadocia turkiye Türkiye 1994
Other Threats: Deterioration of the rock and the mural paintings
No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 1994 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Input of excess energy, Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Need for an inventory of the park's natural and cultural resources
No
kakadu national parkKakadu National Park australia Australia 1994 Management systems/ management plan, Mining, No
mount athosMount Athos greece Greece 1994 Forestry /wood production, Ground transport infrastructure, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Management systems/ management plan, Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: chemical pollution
No
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 1994 Crop production, No
rio abiseo national parkRío Abiseo National Park peru Peru 1994 Forestry /wood production,
Other Threats: Fire; Lack of regular vigilance and inspection; Deterioration of the archaeological remains
No
tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness australia Australia 1994 Forestry /wood production, No
willandra lakes regionWillandra Lakes Region australia Australia 1994 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Problems with landowners resident in the site and aboriginal concerns
No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top