State of Conservation
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Niger |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Decline in wildlife populations |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Seychelles |
Year: | 1986 |
Document Source: | CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Syrian Arab Republic |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Madagascar |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Ghana |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Ghana |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3A,WHC-98/CONF.203/7 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the site |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the site |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the site |
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Brazil Bulgaria Cameroon Central African Republic China Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Ecuador Ethiopia Georgia Germany Ghana Guinea Haiti Honduras India Lithuania Madagascar Mali Mauritania Mozambique Nepal Niger Pakistan Paraguay Peru Philippines Russian Federation Senegal Seychelles Solomon Islands Syrian Arab Republic Tunisia Uganda United Republic of Tanzania Zambia ZimbabweThreats
Financial resources 136
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.