Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

220
Reports
71
Properties concerned
51
States Parties with SOC reports
Threats* : Interpretative and visitation facilitiesclose
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected areas (mainly the Ottoman period timber houses in the district of Zeyrek and Süleymaniye)
States Parties: Belgium
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2015
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: China
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Chile
Year: 2023
Document Source: WHC/23/45.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Chile
Year: 2021
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Paraguay
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Argentina Brazil
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2023
Document Source: WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add.2
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Structural integrity issues at the Church of the Transfiguration
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2021
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Structural integrity issues at the Church of the Transfiguration
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2019
Document Source: WHC/19/43.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Structural integrity issues at the Church of the Transfiguration
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Structural integrity issues at the Church of the Transfiguration
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Czechia
Year: 2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B,WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Corr
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2019
Document Source: WHC/19/43.COM/7A
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7A,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7A
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2015
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7A,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7A
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7A
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2019
Document Source: WHC/19/43.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Impact of the new structure of the Maya Devi Temple (constructed in 2002) on the archaeological remains, as well as on the visual integrity.
States Parties: Lesotho South Africa
Year: 2023
Document Source: WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Buffer zones not yet formalized
States Parties: Lesotho South Africa
Year: 2021
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Buffer zones not yet formalized
States Parties: Lesotho South Africa
Year: 2019
Document Source: WHC/19/43.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Lesotho South Africa
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Lesotho South Africa
Year: 2015
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Need for further research and documentation to establish an inventory of rock art in Sehlabathebe National Park; Need for study of the potential cultural contribution of other landscape elements to the cultural values of Sehlabathebe National Park
States Parties: Kazakhstan
Year: 2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
Document Source: WHC/23/45.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Kazakhstan
Year: 2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Kazakhstan
Year: 2019
Document Source: WHC/19/43.COM/7B.add.2,WHC/19/43.COM/INF.7.Rev.4
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Malta
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Malta
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2023
Document Source: WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Urban encroachment
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2021
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Urban encroachment
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2019
Document Source: WHC/19/43.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: France
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: France
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: France
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: China
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
Document Source: WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add.2
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Challenging situation of community livelihoods; Condition and conservation of the Laetoli hominid footprints
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2021
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Challenging situation of community livelihoods; Condition and conservation of the Laetoli hominid footprints
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2019
Document Source: WHC/19/43.COM/7B.add.2,WHC/19/43.COM/INF.7.Rev.4
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Challenging situation of community livelihoods; Condition and conservation of the Laetoli hominid footprints
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Challenging situation of community livelihoods; Condition and conservation of the Laetoli hominid footprints
States Parties: Belgium
Year: 2024
Document Source: WHC/24/46.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: China
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Mali
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2023
Document Source: WHC/23/45.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2021
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2019
Document Source: WHC/19/43.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Cyprus
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Turkmenistan
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Turkmenistan
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: China
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Lack of maintenance ; Industrial pollution

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top