State of Conservation
84
Reports
40
Properties concerned
29
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2008close
States Parties: | South Africa |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | General poor state of conservation |
States Parties: | Bangladesh |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Absence of photographic information and lack of action taken with regard to the “fragmentary terracotta plaques in the custodian’s house” |
States Parties: | Brazil |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Fire |
States Parties: | Turkmenistan |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Turkmenistan |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | poor conservation conditions for the archaeological remains |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Poor conservation conditons for the archeological remains |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | vegetation with roots seriously affecting archaeological remains |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Concrete reinforcement of the Nam Khan river bank ; Construction of walls along the riverbank of the Mekong; |
States Parties: | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Concrete reinforcement of the Nam Khan river bank ; Construction of walls along the riverbank of the Mekong; |
States Parties: | Lebanon |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Insufficient maintenance |
States Parties: | Lebanon |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Insufficient maintenance |
States Parties: | Lebanon |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: | Lebanon |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Algeria Azerbaijan Bangladesh Brazil Cambodia China Egypt Ghana India Iraq Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Libya Malta Mexico Morocco Nepal Oman Peru Philippines Senegal South Africa Turkmenistan United Republic of Tanzania Viet Nam YemenThreats
Illegal activities 84
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.