State of Conservation
148
Reports
39
Properties concerned
26
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
1996close
States Parties: | Chile |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Chile |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | a) Lack of maintenance of historic buildings; b) Use of reinforced concrete in the centre of town |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Deliberate neglect of historic properties |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Portugal |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | b) Lack of conservation of parks and palaces; |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2023 |
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties
Chile China Colombia Ecuador Egypt Estonia Germany Haiti Hungary India Iran (Islamic Republic of) Italy Lao People's Democratic Republic Malaysia Montenegro Morocco Nepal Pakistan Peru Portugal South Africa Spain Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Uzbekistan
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.