State of Conservation
131
Reports
51
Properties concerned
37
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2007close
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Concrete reinforcement of the Nam Khan river bank ; Construction of walls along the riverbank of the Mekong; |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Concrete reinforcement of the Nam Khan river bank ; Construction of walls along the riverbank of the Mekong; |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties
Afghanistan Austria Bahrain Belgium Brazil Chile China Colombia Cyprus Czechia Egypt France Germany Greece India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Italy Japan Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Malta Montenegro Morocco Pakistan Peru Philippines Slovakia Spain Sweden Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Uzbekistan Viet Nam Yemen
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.