State of Conservation
States Parties: | New Zealand |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Oil spill in the harbour |
States Parties: | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add. |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 1991 |
Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/3 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Brucella infection threat to bison population |
States Parties
Brazil China Denmark Ecuador Egypt Estonia Finland Germany Greece Guatemala Holy See Hungary India Italy Lao People's Democratic Republic Mauritania Morocco Nepal New Zealand Oman Pakistan Peru Romania South Africa Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye United Republic of Tanzania United States of America
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.