Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

49
Reports
49
Properties concerned
34
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2011close
Date end:2011close
Threats* : Air transport infrastructureclose Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructureclose Ground transport infrastructureclose Marine transport infrastructureclose Underground transport infrastructureclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
abu menaAbu Mena egypt Egypt 2011 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Yes
agra fortAgra Fort india India 2011 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Ground transport infrastructure, No
budapest, including the banks of the danube, the buda castle quarter and andrássy avenueBudapest, including the Banks of the Danube, the Buda Castle Quarter and Andrássy Avenue hungary Hungary 2011 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
centennial hall in wrocławCentennial Hall in Wrocław poland Poland 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, No
city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco peru Peru 2011 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
complex of hue monumentsComplex of Hué Monuments viet nam Viet Nam 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, No
dong phayayen-khao yai forest complexDong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex thailand Thailand 2011 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors
 No
fatehpur sikriFatehpur Sikri india India 2011 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Ground transport infrastructure, No
golden mountains of altaiGolden Mountains of Altai russian federation Russian Federation 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, No
great barrier reefGreat Barrier Reef australia Australia 2011 Marine transport infrastructure, No
group of monuments at hampiGroup of Monuments at Hampi india India 2011 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul turkiye Türkiye 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, Underground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas);
 No
historic centre of bukharaHistoric Centre of Bukhara uzbekistan Uzbekistan 2011 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
historic centre of český krumlovHistoric Centre of Český Krumlov czechia Czechia 2011 Underground transport infrastructure, No
historic centre of mexico city and xochimilcoHistoric Centre of Mexico City and Xochimilco mexico Mexico 2011 Underground transport infrastructure, No
historic centre of the city of salzburgHistoric Centre of the City of Salzburg austria Austria 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, No
historic monuments of ancient naraHistoric Monuments of Ancient Nara japan Japan 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, No
historic quarter of the city of colonia del sacramentoHistoric Quarter of the City of Colonia del Sacramento uruguay Uruguay 2011 Marine transport infrastructure, No
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa peru Peru 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, No
ibiza, biodiversity and cultureIbiza, Biodiversity and Culture spain Spain 2011 Marine transport infrastructure, No
kasbah of algiersKasbah of Algiers algeria Algeria 2011 Underground transport infrastructure, No
kaziranga national parkKaziranga National Park india India 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, No
lamu old townLamu Old Town kenya Kenya 2011 Marine transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Fire
 No
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and palpaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa peru Peru 2011 Air transport infrastructure, Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
 No
los katios national parkLos Katíos National Park colombia Colombia 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, Yes
manu national parkManú National Park peru Peru 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, No
maya site of copanMaya Site of Copan honduras Honduras 2011 Air transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: b) Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena;
 No
national history park – citadel, sans souci, ramiersNational History Park – Citadel, Sans Souci, Ramiers haiti Haiti 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, No
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, Yes
okapi wildlife reserveOkapi Wildlife Reserve democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, Yes
old and new towns of edinburghOld and New Towns of Edinburgh united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2011 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
old city of jerusalem and its wallsOld City of Jerusalem and its Walls jerusalem (site proposed by jordan)Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) 2011 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments;
 Yes
old town of galle and its fortificationsOld Town of Galle and its Fortifications sri lanka Sri Lanka 2011 Marine transport infrastructure, No
samarkand – crossroad of culturesSamarkand – Crossroad of Cultures uzbekistan Uzbekistan 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, No
san agustin archaeological parkSan Agustín Archaeological Park colombia Colombia 2011 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: State of conservation of the fabric of the megalithic sculptures
 No
serengeti national parkSerengeti National Park united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, No
simien national parkSimien National Park ethiopia Ethiopia 2011 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Declining populations of Walia ibex, Ethiopian wolf and other large mammal species
 Yes
stone town of zanzibarStone Town of Zanzibar united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2011 Marine transport infrastructure, No
stonehenge, avebury and associated sitesStonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2011 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Ground transport infrastructure, No
taj mahalTaj Mahal india India 2011 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Ground transport infrastructure, No
talamanca range-la amistad reserves / la amistad national parkTalamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park costa rica,panama Costa Rica
Panama		 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, No
tipasaTipasa algeria Algeria 2011 Marine transport infrastructure, No
tokaj wine region historic cultural landscapeTokaj Wine Region Historic Cultural Landscape hungary Hungary 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, No
tropical rainforest heritage of sumatraTropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra indonesia Indonesia 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, No
tyreTyre lebanon Lebanon 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, Marine transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance
 No
upper middle rhine valleyUpper Middle Rhine Valley germany Germany 2011 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Ground transport infrastructure, No
vat phou and associated ancient settlements within the champasak cultural landscapeVat Phou and Associated Ancient Settlements within the Champasak Cultural Landscape lao people's democratic republic Lao People's Democratic Republic 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, No
western caucasusWestern Caucasus russian federation Russian Federation 2011 Ground transport infrastructure, No
works of antoni gaudiWorks of Antoni Gaudí spain Spain 2011 Underground transport infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top