State of Conservation
23
Reports
23
Properties concerned
22
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2003close
Date end:2003close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
banc d'arguin national parkBanc d'Arguin National Park | mauritania Mauritania | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
chitwan national parkChitwan National Park | nepal Nepal | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
dja faunal reserveDja Faunal Reserve | cameroon Cameroon | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
fort and shalamar gardens in lahoreFort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore | pakistan Pakistan | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
group of monuments at hampiGroup of Monuments at Hampi | india India | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
ha long bay - cat ba archipelagoHa Long Bay - Cat Ba Archipelago | viet nam Viet Nam | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Rapid economic development |
No |
historic cairoHistoric Cairo | egypt Egypt | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
historic monuments of ancient naraHistoric Monuments of Ancient Nara | japan Japan | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu | peru Peru | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park | brazil Brazil | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
memphis and its necropolis – the pyramid fields from giza to dahshurMemphis and its Necropolis – the Pyramid Fields from Giza to Dahshur | egypt Egypt | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
minaret and archaeological remains of jamMinaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam | afghanistan Afghanistan | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Need for consolidation and restoration of the monument |
Yes |
mount emei scenic area, including leshan giant buddha scenic areaMount Emei Scenic Area, including Leshan Giant Buddha Scenic Area | china China | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras Honduras | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
sangay national parkSangay National Park | ecuador Ecuador | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
simien national parkSimien National Park | ethiopia Ethiopia | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity |
Yes |
stonehenge, avebury and associated sitesStonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites | united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Risks of collapse |
No |
talamanca range-la amistad reserves / la amistad national parkTalamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park | costa rica,panama Costa Rica Panama |
2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
town of luang prabangTown of Luang Prabang | lao people's democratic republic Lao People's Democratic Republic | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Concrete reinforcement of the Nam Khan river bank ; Construction of walls along the riverbank of the Mekong; |
No |
tyreTyre | lebanon Lebanon | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Important conservation problems ; Need to give more importance to the wealth of the archaeological heritage and of the natural coastal landscape |
No |
vat phou and associated ancient settlements within the champasak cultural landscapeVat Phou and Associated Ancient Settlements within the Champasak Cultural Landscape | lao people's democratic republic Lao People's Democratic Republic | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
volcanoes of kamchatkaVolcanoes of Kamchatka | russian federation Russian Federation | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
wood buffalo national parkWood Buffalo National Park | canada Canada | 2003 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.