Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

22
Reports
10
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:1991close
Threats* : Ground transport infrastructureclose
Garajonay National Park (1991)
States Parties: Spain
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/15
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Great Barrier Reef (1986)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1986
Document Source: CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Great Barrier Reef (1985)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1985
Document Source: SC-85/CONF.008/9
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Town of Ouro Preto (1990)
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.004/3
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Huascarán National Park (1987)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1987
Document Source: SC-87/CONF.005/INF.1
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Fires
Kahuzi-Biega National Park (1991)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/4
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Kahuzi-Biega National Park (1990)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.004/13
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (1991)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/4
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (1990)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.003/3,CC-90/CONF.004/4
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (1989)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
Year: 1989
Document Source: SC-89/CONF.003/12,SC-89/CONF.003/2,SC-89/CONF.004/12,SC-89/CONF.004/5
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (1987)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
Year: 1987
Document Source: SC-87/CONF.005/INF.1
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (1986)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
Year: 1986
Document Source: CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Niokolo-Koba National Park (1990)
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.003/3,CC-90/CONF.004/4
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Niokolo-Koba National Park (1989)
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 1989
Document Source: SC-89/CONF.003/12,SC-89/CONF.003/2,SC-89/CONF.004/12,SC-89/CONF.004/5
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Niokolo-Koba National Park (1988)
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 1988
Document Source: SC-88/CONF.001/4A
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Niokolo-Koba National Park (1987)
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 1987
Document Source: SC-87/CONF.005/INF.1
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Niokolo-Koba National Park (1986)
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 1986
Document Source: CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Río Plátano Biosphere Reserve (1991)
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/4 Add.
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Río Plátano Biosphere Reserve (1990)
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.004/13
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Río Plátano Biosphere Reserve (1989)
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 1989
Document Source: SC-89/CONF.003/12,SC-89/CONF.003/2,SC-89/CONF.004/12,SC-89/CONF.004/5
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Australia Brazil Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Ecuador Guinea Honduras Peru Senegal Spain Türkiye
Threats
Ground transport infrastructure 22

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top