State of Conservation
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration and enhancement of the monumental architecture of Hué |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Cameroon |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Cameroon |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Cameroon |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Decline of the Iberian lynx and Imperial eagle populations |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Decline of the Iberian lynx and Imperial eagle populations |
States Parties: | Thailand |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors. |
States Parties: | Thailand |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors |
States Parties
Afghanistan Australia Austria Bahrain Belgium Brazil Cameroon Canada Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Cyprus Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Dominica Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia France Germany Greece Guinea Honduras India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Italy Japan Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Malta Mauritania Mexico Montenegro Morocco Nepal Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Russian Federation Senegal Slovakia Spain Sweden Syrian Arab Republic Thailand Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uzbekistan Viet Nam Yemen
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.