State of Conservation
111
Reports
44
Properties concerned
37
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2009close
States Parties: | Greece |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/2,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Adverse meteorological conditions |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | a) Lack of capacity in conservation techniques; b) Lack of monitoring system |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Human resources |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
States Parties: | Iraq |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | particularly worrying state of conservation |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Dilapidated infrastructure; Neglect and lack of maintenance |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Human resources |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
States Parties: | Mexico |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | a) Urban decay of the Historic Centreb) Water and environmental pollutionc) Lack of monitoring systems |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Risk of fire |
States Parties: | Bangladesh |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Risk of collapse of historic buildings; |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | a) Risk of collapse of historic buildingsb) Construction of the replica of the Gorée Memorial |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | a) Building threatened to collapseb) Construction of the replica of the Goree Memoria |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Growing number of collapsed or seriously dilapidated buildings; |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Buildings threatened with collapse |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Extremely poor state of conservation of numerous derelict buildings endangering occupants; |
States Parties
Afghanistan Algeria Argentina Bangladesh Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Cambodia Canada Dominican Republic Egypt Ethiopia Germany Ghana Greece India Iraq Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Libya Mali Malta Mauritania Mexico Mozambique Nepal Oman Pakistan Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Senegal South Africa Turkmenistan United Republic of Tanzania ZimbabweThreats
Human resources 111
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.