State of Conservation
26
Reports
26
Properties concerned
17
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2004close
Date end:2004close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
agra fortAgra Fort | india India | 2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Worrying state of conservation of Agra Fort |
No |
archaeological site of cyreneArchaeological Site of Cyrene | libya Libya | 2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Uncontrolled growth of plants and trees |
No |
city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco | peru Peru | 2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Deliberate neglect of historic properties |
No |
east rennellEast Rennell | solomon islands Solomon Islands | 2004 | Financial resources, | No |
fatehpur sikriFatehpur Sikri | india India | 2004 | Financial resources, | No |
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands | ecuador Ecuador | 2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: a) Weaknesses in quarantine measures; b) Passage of international and national marine traffic |
No |
garamba national parkGaramba National Park | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2004 | Financial resources, | Yes |
ha long bay - cat ba archipelagoHa Long Bay - Cat Ba Archipelago | viet nam Viet Nam | 2004 | Financial resources, | No |
kahuzi-biega national parkKahuzi-Biega National Park | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2004 | Financial resources, | Yes |
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation Russian Federation | 2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Fragile wooden heritage |
No |
lorentz national parkLorentz National Park | indonesia Indonesia | 2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: a) Security limitations on staff and public access to parts of the Park; b) Fire |
No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india India | 2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Damaged Park infrastructure |
Yes |
manovo-gounda st floris national parkManovo-Gounda St Floris National Park | central african republic Central African Republic | 2004 | Financial resources, | Yes |
okapi wildlife reserveOkapi Wildlife Reserve | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2004 | Financial resources, | Yes |
old city of jerusalem and its wallsOld City of Jerusalem and its Walls | jerusalem (site proposed by jordan)Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) | 2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance; b) Natural factors |
Yes |
pirin national parkPirin National Park | bulgaria Bulgaria | 2004 | Financial resources, | No |
rice terraces of the philippine cordillerasRice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras | philippines Philippines | 2004 | Financial resources, | Yes |
ruins of kilwa kisiwani and ruins of songo mnaraRuins of Kilwa Kisiwani and Ruins of Songo Mnara | united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania | 2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Collapsing monuments due to lack of maintenance |
No |
sagarmatha national parkSagarmatha National Park | nepal Nepal | 2004 | Financial resources, | No |
salonga national parkSalonga National Park | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2004 | Financial resources, | Yes |
taj mahalTaj Mahal | india India | 2004 | Financial resources, | No |
tipasaTipasa | algeria Algeria | 2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: State of conservation of mosaics and other exposed structures |
Yes |
town of luang prabangTown of Luang Prabang | lao people's democratic republic Lao People's Democratic Republic | 2004 | Financial resources, | No |
virunga national parkVirunga National Park | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2004 | Financial resources, | Yes |
volcanoes of kamchatkaVolcanoes of Kamchatka | russian federation Russian Federation | 2004 | Financial resources, | No |
walled city of baku with the shirvanshah's palace and maiden towerWalled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower | azerbaijan Azerbaijan | 2004 | Financial resources, | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.