State of Conservation
14
Reports
14
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
2004close
Date end:2004close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
east rennellEast Rennell | solomon islands |
2004 | Financial resources, | No |
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands | ecuador |
2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: a) Weaknesses in quarantine measures; b) Passage of international and national marine traffic |
No |
garamba national parkGaramba National Park | democratic republic of the congo |
2004 | Financial resources, | Yes |
ha long bay - cat ba archipelagoHa Long Bay - Cat Ba Archipelago | viet nam |
2004 | Financial resources, | No |
kahuzi-biega national parkKahuzi-Biega National Park | democratic republic of the congo |
2004 | Financial resources, | Yes |
lorentz national parkLorentz National Park | indonesia |
2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: a) Security limitations on staff and public access to parts of the Park; b) Fire |
No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
2004 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Damaged Park infrastructure |
Yes |
manovo-gounda st floris national parkManovo-Gounda St Floris National Park | central african republic |
2004 | Financial resources, | Yes |
okapi wildlife reserveOkapi Wildlife Reserve | democratic republic of the congo |
2004 | Financial resources, | Yes |
pirin national parkPirin National Park | bulgaria |
2004 | Financial resources, | No |
sagarmatha national parkSagarmatha National Park | nepal |
2004 | Financial resources, | No |
salonga national parkSalonga National Park | democratic republic of the congo |
2004 | Financial resources, | Yes |
virunga national parkVirunga National Park | democratic republic of the congo |
2004 | Financial resources, | Yes |
volcanoes of kamchatkaVolcanoes of Kamchatka | russian federation |
2004 | Financial resources, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.