State of Conservation
8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
2011close
Date end:2011close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
archaeological site of panamá viejo and historic district of panamáArchaeological Site of Panamá Viejo and Historic District of Panamá | panama |
2011 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: a) Severe deterioration of historic buildings that threatens the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; |
No |
budapest, including the banks of the danube, the buda castle quarter and andrássy avenueBudapest, including the Banks of the Danube, the Buda Castle Quarter and Andrássy Avenue | hungary |
2011 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone | peru |
2011 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | Yes |
historic cairoHistoric Cairo | egypt |
2011 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Dilapidated infrastructure; Neglect and lack of maintenance |
No |
historic centre of bukharaHistoric Centre of Bukhara | uzbekistan |
2011 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
island of goreeIsland of Gorée | senegal |
2011 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: risk of collapse of historic building |
No |
old city of jerusalem and its wallsOld City of Jerusalem and its Walls | jerusalem (site proposed by jordan)Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) | 2011 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments; |
Yes |
old city of sana'aOld City of Sana'a | yemen |
2011 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.