State of Conservation
20
Reports
20
Properties concerned
18
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2015close
Date end:2015close
States Parties: | Bolivia (Plurinational State of) |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Mining |
Other Threats: | Instability and risk of collapse of the Cerro Rico; Deficiencies in conservation: special attention required for the restoration and upgrading of structures with residential use and the archaeological industrial heritage |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | Cameroon |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Mining |
Other Threats: | State of the Guadalquivir River and dredging project |
States Parties: | Solomon Islands |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A.Add,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Mining |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | South Africa |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Mining |
Other Threats: | Acid mine drainage |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Mining |
Other Threats: | vulnerabilities of certain individual structures within the forts requiring short-term conservation actions |
States Parties: | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Mining |
Other Threats: | Villages in the ecological corridor between the highland and lowland sectors of the park |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | Central African Republic |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A.Add,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Mining |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Mining |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A.Add,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Mining |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Mining |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Madagascar |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Mining |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Central African Republic Congo Cameroon |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Mining |
Other Threats: | Significant decline of wildlife populations due to poaching |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Mining |
Other Threats: | Apparent decline in wildlife populations |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Mining |
Other Threats: | Decline in populations of wild reindeer and snow sheep |
States Parties
Australia Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Cameroon Central African Republic China Congo Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Guinea India Madagascar Russian Federation Senegal Solomon Islands South Africa Spain United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of TanzaniaThreats
Mining 20
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.