Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

6
Reports
1
Properties concerned
1
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property: Historical Monuments at Makli, Thattaclose
Date end:2013close
Threats* : Erosion and siltation/ depositionclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
historical monuments at makli, thattaHistorical Monuments at Makli, Thatta pakistan Pakistan 2013 Erosion and siltation/ deposition,
Other Threats: Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb
 No
historical monuments at makli, thattaHistorical Monuments at Makli, Thatta pakistan Pakistan 2012 Erosion and siltation/ deposition,
Other Threats: Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb
 No
historical monuments at makli, thattaHistorical Monuments at Makli, Thatta pakistan Pakistan 2011 Erosion and siltation/ deposition,
Other Threats: b) Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb;
 No
historical monuments at makli, thattaHistorical Monuments at Makli, Thatta pakistan Pakistan 2009 Erosion and siltation/ deposition,
Other Threats: a) Significant decay of the property caused by local climatic conditions and alluvial erosionb) Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tombd) Lack of monitoring
 No
historical monuments at makli, thattaHistorical Monuments at Makli, Thatta pakistan Pakistan 2007 Erosion and siltation/ deposition,
Other Threats: Significant decay of the property caused by the local climatic conditions
 No
historical monuments at makli, thattaHistorical Monuments at Makli, Thatta pakistan Pakistan 2006 Erosion and siltation/ deposition,
Other Threats: poor state of conservation
 No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top