State of Conservation
11
Reports
6
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2004close
Region:
Africaclose
States Parties: | Ghana |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Salt-laden atmosphere |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Dilapidated state of some buildings |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Kenya |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Fire |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
States Parties: | South Africa |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | a) Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities; b) Fire |
States Parties: | South Africa |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities |
Threats
Solid waste 11
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.