State of Conservation
9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2017close
Date end:2017close
Threats* : Air transport infrastructureclose
Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructureclose
Ground transport infrastructureclose
Marine transport infrastructureclose
Underground transport infrastructureclose
Region:
Africaclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
ecosystem and relict cultural landscape of lope-okandaEcosystem and Relict Cultural Landscape of Lopé-Okanda | gabon Gabon | 2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
lamu old townLamu Old Town | kenya Kenya | 2017 | Air transport infrastructure,
Marine transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Deterioration of dwellings |
No |
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area | united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania | 2017 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Challenging situation of community livelihoods; Condition and conservation of the Laetoli hominid footprints |
No |
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park | senegal Senegal | 2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
okapi wildlife reserveOkapi Wildlife Reserve | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
osun-osogbo sacred groveOsun-Osogbo Sacred Grove | nigeria Nigeria | 2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
sangha trinationalSangha Trinational | cameroon,central african republic,congo Central African Republic Congo Cameroon |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
simien national parkSimien National Park | ethiopia Ethiopia | 2017 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Declining populations of Walia ibex, Ethiopian wolf and other large mammal species |
Yes |
tombs of buganda kings at kasubiTombs of Buganda Kings at Kasubi | uganda Uganda | 2017 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Fire |
Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.