Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

28
Reports
12
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2016close
Threats* : Financial resourcesclose
Region: Arab Statesclose
Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls (2004)
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance; b) Natural factors
Danger List:  Yes
Old Walled City of Shibam (2016)
States Parties: Yemen
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Financial resources
Danger List:  Yes
Tipasa (2004)
States Parties: Algeria
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: State of conservation of mosaics and other exposed structures
Danger List:  Yes
Tipasa (2003)
States Parties: Algeria
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges
Danger List:  Yes
Tipasa (2002)
States Parties: Algeria
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges
Wadi Al-Hitan (Whale Valley) (2010)
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Financial resources
Wadi Rum Protected Area (2016)
States Parties: Jordan
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Financial resources
Wadi Rum Protected Area (2014)
States Parties: Jordan
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Financial resources
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Algeria Egypt Jordan Libya Mauritania Syrian Arab Republic Tunisia Yemen
Threats
Financial resources 28

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top