State of Conservation
10
Reports
8
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:1988close
Region:
Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
| Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands | ecuador Ecuador |
1986 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
| galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands | ecuador Ecuador |
1985 |
Other Threats: Fire |
No |
| historic centre of the town of olindaHistoric Centre of the Town of Olinda | brazil Brazil |
1987 | Avalanche/ landslide, Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, | No |
| historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu | peru Peru |
1987 | Housing,
Land conversion,
Major linear utilities,
Management systems/ management plan,
Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Fires |
No |
| huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park | peru Peru |
1987 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Illegal activities,
Legal framework,
Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals,
Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure,
Other Threats: Fires |
No |
| iguazu national parkIguazu National Park | argentina Argentina |
1986 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
| los glaciares national parkLos Glaciares National Park | argentina Argentina |
1986 | Housing, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Land conversion, Water infrastructure, | No |
| los glaciares national parkLos Glaciares National Park | argentina Argentina |
1985 | Housing, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Land conversion, | No |
| manu national parkManú National Park | peru Peru |
1988 | Oil and gas, | No |
| rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras Honduras |
1988 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
