State of Conservation
17
Reports
17
Properties concerned
12
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2008close
Date end:2008close
Region:
Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
archaeological site of panamá viejo and historic district of panamáArchaeological Site of Panamá Viejo and Historic District of Panamá | panama |
2008 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Severe deterioration of historic buildings that threatens the outstanding universal value of the property |
No |
chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone | peru |
2008 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Continuous deterioration of earthen architecture structures and decorated surfaces from lack of conservation and maintenance practices; |
Yes |
coro and its portCoro and its Port | venezuela (bolivarian republic of) |
2008 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Serious deterioration of materials and structures; Deterioration of the architectural and urban coherence and integrity of the property |
Yes |
fortifications on the caribbean side of panama: portobelo-san lorenzoFortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo | panama |
2008 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Deterioration and destruction of the fabric of the property by environmental factors, lack of maintenance, as well as polluted water |
No |
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands | ecuador |
2008 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Educational reform not implemented. |
Yes |
historic centre of mexico city and xochimilcoHistoric Centre of Mexico City and Xochimilco | mexico |
2008 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
historic quarter of the city of colonia del sacramentoHistoric Quarter of the City of Colonia del Sacramento | uruguay |
2008 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu | peru |
2008 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
humberstone and santa laura saltpeter worksHumberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Works | chile |
2008 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, in addition to stucco and lightweight construction; Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years ; Corrosion of metal cladding and dismantlement of some of the structural elements. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is given ; Very little conservation work carried out |
Yes |
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park | brazil |
2008 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
iguazu national parkIguazu National Park | argentina |
2008 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
los katios national parkLos Katíos National Park | colombia |
2008 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
maya site of copanMaya Site of Copan | honduras |
2008 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena |
No |
port, fortresses and group of monuments, cartagenaPort, Fortresses and Group of Monuments, Cartagena | colombia |
2008 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Dilapidated state of conservation of the Church of Santo Domingo |
No |
pre-hispanic city of teotihuacanPre-Hispanic City of Teotihuacan | mexico |
2008 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras |
2008 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
tiwanaku: spiritual and political centre of the tiwanaku cultureTiwanaku: Spiritual and Political Centre of the Tiwanaku Culture | bolivia (plurinational state of) |
2008 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.