Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Historic Quarter of the City of Colonia del Sacramento

Uruguay
Factors affecting the property in 2008*
  • Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Marine transport infrastructure
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports

a) Inappropriate architectural and urban design for a hotel-casino in a building block at the old harbour;

b) Need to strengthen management planning for the historic quarter.

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2008

Total amount provided to the property: Technical mission financed by the Spanish Funds-in-Trust allocated to World Heritage. 

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2008
Requests approved: 1 (from 1994-1994)
Total amount approved : 5,000 USD
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2008

The World Heritage Centre received a request from the State Party dated 27 November 2007 to organize a technical mission to the Historic Quarter of the City of Colonia del Sacramento, Uruguay, concerning recent developments as part of a longstanding construction project, “Marinas de Sacramento”, which includes a yacht harbor, hotel and convention centre adjacent the World Heritage property. The documentation provided by the State Party as a basis for the technical mission indicated the principal problem to be a lack of agreement among key national and local stakeholders concerning the abovementioned project. At the time of the request, the World Heritage Centre received information from the State Party which provided the official baseline information to undertake the mission.

This project was initially launched by the Ministry of Transportation and Public Works of Uruguay in 1994, prior to the inscription of the property on the World Heritage List in 1995. Following a study by a special commission created by the Ministry of Transport and Public Works for this purpose, the project was approved in December 1998. Between February 1999 and December 2001, project planning began and environmental impact procedures were set in place. However, the project was suspended in 2000 and recommenced in 2006 with the support of the Ministry of Transport and Public Works, and the Municipality of Colonia del Sacramento, with environmental impact assessments still incomplete.Subsequently the Executive Council of Colonia and the National Directorate of Environment (DINAMA) have expressed reservations about certain aspects of the project.

The World Heritage Committee has also expressed its own reservations about the project. At its 27th session (UNESCO, 2003), the World Heritage Committee invited the State Party to proceed with the revision of the hotel-casino project in accordance with the recommendations of the 2002 ICOMOS expert mission, and to urgently initiate the preparation of master and management plans for the area. At its 29th session (Durban, 2005), the World Heritage Committee was notified that the hotel-casino plan was being revised following recommendations of the ICOMOS technical mission in May 2004. The World Heritage Committee asked to be kept informed of subsequent progress with the project and the development of a management plan.

In February 2005, the “The Bay and the Islands of Colonia del Sacramento” property was inscribed on Uruguay’s Tentative List as a possible future extension of the existing World Heritage property.

An ICOMOS technical mission to the property took place from 9 to 11 June 2008. The mission particularly looked at the situation of the yacht harbor, hotel and convention centre, and provided a very useful social context for examination of the project. In evaluating the possible impacts associated with this project, it is important to recognize the social changes which have occurred in the years since its inscription. The residential population of the Historic Quarter of Colonia del Sacramento has declined by 50% since 1995, and the focus of the district has shifted to accommodating tourism initiatives (hotels, restaurants, entertainment centers) within what used to be residential structures. The proposed project would bring in tourists and visitors in much greater numbers than at present, and is likely remove the “living” qualities of the historic quarter.

The principal conclusions and recommendations of the mission are as follows:

a) In spite of the negative impacts offered by the rapid growth of tourism and the replacement of part of its residential population by tourism-related activities, the World Heritage property maintains its outstanding universal value, as well as its authenticity and integrity;

b) Nevertheless, management effectiveness and technical conservation efficiency needs to be improved, and several threats to the property need to be confronted to maintain its heritage values. The mission report makes particular recommendations about the need to establish guidelines for treatment of facades, siding, colors and the retention of plaster;

c) The lack of an integrated management plan requires urgent attention in efforts to improve conditions on site. In particular the mission recommends the completion of the management plan that began in 2003 and was interrupted in 2007, and provides a detailed description of the activities that the plan must direct, the issues it must confront, and the forms of control, coordination and collaboration it must employ. As well, it suggests the need to initiate the restoration of buildings on the “Calle de los Suspiros” and several buildings in the old port;

d) While the operating institutional frameworks at national and local levels are adequate, it would also be important to provide a management authority specifically charged with safeguarding the property’s heritage values in the context of World Heritage, to guide the implementation of the required integrated management plan, related conservation activities, and the coordination of the actions and interventions of other national and local actors and organisms;

The mission report suggests that the project “Marinas de Sacramento” be suspended pending studies of alternate locations for the project which would not compromise the integrated qualities of the Historic Quarter and its maritime environment. Additionally, the Bay itself now figures in the Uruguayan Tentative List and has underwater heritage values. The mission report suggests that the alternatives developed must be 

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2008
32 COM 7B.128
Historic Quarter of the City of Colonia del Sacramento (Uruguay) (C747)

The World Heritage Committee,

1. Having examined Document WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add.2,

2. Recalling Decision 29 COM 7B.99, adopted at its 29th session (Durban, 2005),

3. Acknowledges the request made by State Party for a technical mission to review the foreseen interventions and to examine the state of conservation of the property and notes the results of this mission;

4. Also notes that strong efforts are needed to improve management planning, and urges the State Party to complete the management plan and to officially establish a management authority for the coordination of the activities of the many national and local actors, organisations and stakeholders involved;

5. Also urges the State Party to suspend the development of the project "Marinas de Sacramento" until alternatives without negative impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property have been identified, and to submit the alternative proposals to the World Heritage Centre and Advisory Bodies for evaluation, in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines;

6. Invites the State Party to propose the extension of the property to include the "Bay and Islands of the City of Colonia del Sacramento";

7. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Committee, by 1 February 2009, a report on the progress made in addressing the above issues and the recommendations expressed by the mission report, to be examined by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session in 2009.

Draft Decision: 32 COM 7B.128

The World Heritage Committee,

1. Having examined Document WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add.2,

2. Recalling Decision 29 COM 7B.99, adopted at its 29th session (Durban, 2005),

3. Acknowledges the request made by State Party for a technical mission to review the foreseen interventions and to examine the state of conservation of the property and notes the results of this mission;

4. Also notes that strong efforts are needed to improve management planning, and urges the State Party to complete the management plan and to officially establish a management authority for the coordination of the activities of the many national and local actors, organisms and stakeholders involved;

5. Also urges the State Party to suspend the development of the project “Marinas de Sacramento” until alternatives without negative impacts on the outstanding universal value of the property have been identified, and to submit the alternative proposals to the World Heritage Centre and Advisory Bodies for evaluation, in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines;

6. Invites the State Party to prepare the extension of the property to include the “Bay and Islands of the City of Colonia del Sacramento”;

7. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Committee, by 1 February 2009, a report on the progress made in addressing the above issues and the recommendations expressed by the mission report, to be examined by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session in 2009.

 

Report year: 2008
Uruguay
Date of Inscription: 1995
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (iv)
Documents examined by the Committee
arrow_circle_right 32COM (2008)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top