State of Conservation
8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
2001close
Date end:2001close
Region:
Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
antigua guatemalaAntigua Guatemala | guatemala Guatemala | 2001 | Commercial development, Earthquake, | No |
brasiliaBrasilia | brazil Brazil | 2001 | Housing, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Legal framework, | No |
chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone | peru Peru | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Land conversion,
Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures |
Yes |
chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) | peru Peru | 2001 | Financial resources,
Human resources,
Management systems/ management plan,
Other climate change impacts,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site |
No |
colonial city of santo domingoColonial City of Santo Domingo | dominican republic Dominican Republic | 2001 | High impact research / monitoring activities, Housing, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Legal framework, Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, Management systems/ management plan, | No |
fortifications on the caribbean side of panama: portobelo-san lorenzoFortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo | panama Panama | 2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, | No |
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa | peru Peru | 2001 | Earthquake, | No |
joya de ceren archaeological siteJoya de Cerén Archaeological Site | el salvador El Salvador | 2001 | Earthquake, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.