State of Conservation
8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
4
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
1994close
Date end:1994close
Region:
Asia and the Pacificclose
| Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| angkorAngkor | cambodia Cambodia |
1994 | Human resources,
Legal framework,
Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Urgent problems of conservation |
Yes |
| complex of hue monumentsComplex of Hué Monuments | viet nam Viet Nam |
1994 | Invasive/alien terrestrial species,
Other Threats: Fire |
No |
| imperial palaces of the ming and qing dynasties in beijing and shenyangImperial Palaces of the Ming and Qing Dynasties in Beijing and Shenyang | china China |
1994 | Air pollution, Erosion and siltation/ deposition, | No |
| kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal |
1994 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Housing,
Land conversion,
Management activities,
Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
| mausoleum of the first qin emperorMausoleum of the First Qin Emperor | china China |
1994 |
Other Threats: earthen architecture conservation problems |
No |
| mogao cavesMogao Caves | china China |
1994 |
Other Threats: Deterioration of the mural paintings in the caves due to salt migration; Some built features have nothing to do with the site and should be destroyed (concrete tower, modern blockhouse, ...) |
No |
| peking man site at zhoukoudianPeking Man Site at Zhoukoudian | china China |
1994 | Interpretative and visitation facilities,
Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Unstable archaeological strata and cave roof |
No |
| the great wallThe Great Wall | china China |
1994 | Ground transport infrastructure, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Interpretative and visitation facilities, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
