Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

23
Reports
11
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2008close
Threats* : Deliberate destruction of heritageclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
bordeaux, port of the moonBordeaux, Port of the Moon france France 2008 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
city of graz – historic centre and schloss eggenbergCity of Graz – Historic Centre and Schloss Eggenberg austria Austria 2004 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
hanseatic city of lubeckHanseatic City of Lübeck germany Germany 1994 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
hanseatic city of lubeckHanseatic City of Lübeck germany Germany 1993 Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Discovery of mural paintings - need for restoration
No
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul turkiye Türkiye 2004 Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the civil architecture
No
historic centre of naplesHistoric Centre of Naples italy Italy 2001 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
kremlin and red square, moscowKremlin and Red Square, Moscow russian federation Russian Federation 2008 Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Erection of a monument in honour of Marshal G. Zhukov
No
kremlin and red square, moscowKremlin and Red Square, Moscow russian federation Russian Federation 2007 Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Erection of a monument in honour of Marshal G. Zhukov
No
megalithic temples of maltaMegalithic Temples of Malta malta Malta 2007 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
megalithic temples of maltaMegalithic Temples of Malta malta Malta 2005 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
megalithic temples of maltaMegalithic Temples of Malta malta Malta 2004 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
megalithic temples of maltaMegalithic Temples of Malta malta Malta 2001 Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Instability of structures
No
old town of ávila with its extra-muros churchesOld Town of Ávila with its Extra-Muros Churches spain Spain 2005 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
rock art of altaRock Art of Alta norway Norway 2004 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
vilnius historic centreVilnius Historic Centre lithuania Lithuania 2008 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
vilnius historic centreVilnius Historic Centre lithuania Lithuania 2006 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
walled city of baku with the shirvanshah's palace and maiden towerWalled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower azerbaijan Azerbaijan 2008 Deliberate destruction of heritage, Yes
walled city of baku with the shirvanshah's palace and maiden towerWalled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower azerbaijan Azerbaijan 2007 Deliberate destruction of heritage, Yes
walled city of baku with the shirvanshah's palace and maiden towerWalled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower azerbaijan Azerbaijan 2006 Deliberate destruction of heritage, Yes
walled city of baku with the shirvanshah's palace and maiden towerWalled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower azerbaijan Azerbaijan 2005 Deliberate destruction of heritage, Yes
walled city of baku with the shirvanshah's palace and maiden towerWalled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower azerbaijan Azerbaijan 2004 Deliberate destruction of heritage, Yes
walled city of baku with the shirvanshah's palace and maiden towerWalled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower azerbaijan Azerbaijan 2003 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
walled city of baku with the shirvanshah's palace and maiden towerWalled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower azerbaijan Azerbaijan 2002 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top