Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

99
Reports
11
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Threats* : Surface water pollutionclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Curonian Spit (2018)
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7B
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Curonian Spit (2016)
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Curonian Spit (2012)
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Curonian Spit (2011)
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Curonian Spit (2010)
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Curonian Spit (2008)
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Curonian Spit (2007)
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Danube Delta (2009)
States Parties: Romania
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Other Threats: b) Deepwater navigation waterway through the Bystroe mouth of the Danube River;
Danube Delta (2008)
States Parties: Romania
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Other Threats: Deepwater navigation waterway through the Bystre mouth of the Danube River
Danube Delta (2006)
States Parties: Romania
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Other Threats: Deepwater navigation waterway through the Bystre mouth of the Danube River
Danube Delta (2005)
States Parties: Romania
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Doñana National Park (2000)
States Parties: Spain
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Doñana National Park (1999)
States Parties: Spain
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Doñana National Park (1998)
States Parties: Spain
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Durmitor National Park (1998)
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Other Threats: Earthen containment structures
Durmitor National Park (1997)
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Other Threats: Earthen containment structures
Durmitor National Park (1996)
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Other Threats: Fire
Durmitor National Park (1993)
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Durmitor National Park (1992)
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 1992
Document Source: CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Durmitor National Park (1991)
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/4
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Bulgaria Croatia Germany Hungary Lithuania Montenegro Romania Russian Federation Spain United States of America
Threats
Surface water pollution 99

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top