State of Conservation
285
Reports
79
Properties concerned
34
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2008close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
| States Parties: |
 Portugal
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| Other Threats: | Several elements of the World Heritage site in a serious condition; Fire |
| States Parties: |
Portugal
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
Portugal
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
Portugal
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| Other Threats: | Need for a restoration programme |
| States Parties: |
 Lithuania Russian Federation
|
| Year: | 2008 |
| Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
Lithuania Russian Federation
|
| Year: | 2007 |
| Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
Lithuania Russian Federation
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
Lithuania Russian Federation
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
 Canada
|
| Year: | 1992 |
| Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
Canada
|
| Year: | 1991 |
| Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/4 Add. |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
 Spain
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
Spain
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
Spain
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| Other Threats: | Decline of the Iberian lynx and Imperial eagle populations |
| States Parties: |
Spain
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| Other Threats: | Decline of the Iberian lynx and Imperial eagle populations |
| States Parties: |
 Montenegro
|
| Year: | 2008 |
| Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
Montenegro
|
| Year: | 2007 |
| Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
Montenegro
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
Montenegro
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
Montenegro
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| Other Threats: | Earthen containment structures |
| States Parties: |
Montenegro
|
| Year: | 1997 |
| Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| Other Threats: | Earthen containment structures |
States Parties
Albania Andorra Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Bulgaria Canada Croatia Czechia Denmark Estonia France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Lithuania Malta Montenegro North Macedonia Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russian Federation Serbia Slovenia Spain Türkiye Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United States of America
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
