State of Conservation
11
Reports
7
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2004close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
city of graz – historic centre and schloss eggenbergCity of Graz – Historic Centre and Schloss Eggenberg | austria Austria | 2004 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
hanseatic city of lubeckHanseatic City of Lübeck | germany Germany | 1994 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
hanseatic city of lubeckHanseatic City of Lübeck | germany Germany | 1993 | Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Discovery of mural paintings - need for restoration |
No |
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul | turkiye Türkiye | 2004 | Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the civil architecture |
No |
historic centre of naplesHistoric Centre of Naples | italy Italy | 2001 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
megalithic temples of maltaMegalithic Temples of Malta | malta Malta | 2004 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
megalithic temples of maltaMegalithic Temples of Malta | malta Malta | 2001 | Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Instability of structures |
No |
rock art of altaRock Art of Alta | norway Norway | 2004 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
walled city of baku with the shirvanshah's palace and maiden towerWalled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower | azerbaijan Azerbaijan | 2004 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | Yes |
walled city of baku with the shirvanshah's palace and maiden towerWalled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower | azerbaijan Azerbaijan | 2003 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
walled city of baku with the shirvanshah's palace and maiden towerWalled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower | azerbaijan Azerbaijan | 2002 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.