State of Conservation
18
Reports
6
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2000close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
canadian rocky mountain parksCanadian Rocky Mountain Parks | canada |
1999 | Mining, | No |
canadian rocky mountain parksCanadian Rocky Mountain Parks | canada |
1998 | Mining, | No |
canadian rocky mountain parksCanadian Rocky Mountain Parks | canada |
1997 | Mining, | No |
canadian rocky mountain parksCanadian Rocky Mountain Parks | canada |
1996 | Mining, | No |
canadian rocky mountain parksCanadian Rocky Mountain Parks | canada |
1995 | Mining, | No |
danube deltaDanube Delta | romania |
2000 | Mining, | No |
donana national parkDoñana National Park | spain |
2000 | Mining, | No |
donana national parkDoñana National Park | spain |
1999 | Mining, | No |
donana national parkDoñana National Park | spain |
1998 | Mining, | No |
virgin komi forestsVirgin Komi Forests | russian federation |
1998 | Mining, | No |
virgin komi forestsVirgin Komi Forests | russian federation |
1997 | Mining, | No |
volcanoes of kamchatkaVolcanoes of Kamchatka | russian federation |
2000 | Mining, | No |
volcanoes of kamchatkaVolcanoes of Kamchatka | russian federation |
1998 | Mining, | No |
volcanoes of kamchatkaVolcanoes of Kamchatka | russian federation |
1997 | Mining, | No |
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park | united states of america |
1997 | Mining,
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population |
Yes |
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park | united states of america |
1996 | Mining,
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population |
Yes |
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park | united states of america |
1995 | Mining,
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population |
No |
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park | united states of america |
1994 | Mining, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.